User talk:Azerael000

June 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Sri Ram Sena has been reverted. Your edit here to Sri Ram Sena was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://youtube.com/c/TheAbhishekTiwaryShow) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:16, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Hello, I'm WikiDan61. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sri Ram Sena without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:49, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello WikiDan61.

My humble appologies that I couldn't mention adequate reason as of why the modification were being made because it is a work in progress.

Yes, I did intentionally remove some contents from the Sri Ram Sena page because it has been brought to my attention by the owners of this organization that some of these contents were "irrelevant" and "misleading" according to their original historical events that were actually relevant of their very existence. That is why I've deleted the contents claimed by them to be replaced with more relevant content along with proper historical evidence for the same. So temporarily the contents are being deleted by me and will soon be replaced with more proper and relevant content along with proper explanation for this page in the next few days accordingly. So I would like to request the page to be left as it is after my recent content modification that I've made as more content will be added shortly.

Thank you. Azerael000 (talk) 12:43, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * It is not up to the organization itself to decide what information is relevant or not relevant on their Wikipedia page. Wikipedia editors rely on what independent sources have said about the organization, not what the organization says about itself. Since you appear to be working on behalf of the organization, you have a conflict of interest and should not continue to edit the page. Instead, if you find that the page contains factual errors, you should request specific changes at the article's talk page, with citations to reliable sources to back the facts that you would prefer to see presented. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:14, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

@WikiDan61 I do believe that I haven't mentioned any written statement proclaiming that I've been working on behalf on the organization. And I'm aware of the basic fact of what independent & reliable sources does Wikipedia Editors depend on and as a matter of fact I've been presented with such Independent & realiable sources which are completely based on external medias with no connections made with the organization itself however they've written articles or information about this organization with proper facts & evidences which are actually contradictory to the contents that were previously written in the page itself. And as mentioned before, I do plan on adding all the updated contents contradictory to the previous contents with proper evidences to prove that the previous information written in the page were irrelevant/misleading as the earliest possible which is why the modification made was temporarily made and was targeted to last for 1 month which is sufficient for myself to present the information that I find to be more logical, relevant and accurate compared to the previous content.

However if you still have a issue with the hands on approach I've made and if you still require a citation from reliable sources at the article's talk page, then it will be done accordingly. Azerael000 (talk) 13:43, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * In your own comment above, you mentioned ...it has been brought to my attention by the owners of this organization...; to my mind, that means you are making these edits because the organization has asked you to do so. Whether or not that is the case, you should not remove properly cited material simply because the organization doesn't feel that information is relevant. If the information is wrong, and if you have reliable sources that refute the sources used in the article, please present your sources in the article talk page to allow the community to evaluate your proposed changes. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:00, 2 July 2021 (UTC)