User talk:Azslande

Piercing Related Articles
It's good to see other people interested in improving the quality of the various piercing related articles on Wikipedia. I re-formatted many of the jewelry pages and have done many edits and re-designs of the variosu piercing pages. I noticed that you have been creating articles for piercings which do not currently have pages, which is great. Off and on, I've been trying to address these pages, but my outside work keeps me busy and I haven't found the time to really dig into it.

IMHO the [tongue piercing] page is a good example of a layout for describing individual piercings. Three sections, a general description (placement, basic healing information, general data) a jewelry section (indicating common jewelry types and materials), a historical section (pre-contemporary history, entemology and pop culture) makes for a pretty full description, plus references.

Also, I noticed that you created a page for rejection rate. I've already created a page called piercing migration which addresses this issue in depth, and maybe it would be in the best interest of the subject to merge any data on rejection (which I'd see as a type of migration - total migration) with that page and delete the rejection rate page, as the piercing migration page has many pages linking to it already. There are some grammar and style issues with the rejection rate page as it stands as well, while the piercing migration page is more in line with the proper style of a Wikipedia page. Glowimperial 01:08, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Mcdactor1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mcdactor1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:38, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Paulreubens.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Paulreubens.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 17:08, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Azslande.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Azslande.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU ≈ talk 16:12, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Comment on D&E article
I've reworded some of the dilation and evacuation article. There's a discussion at Talk:Dilation and evacuation, and any comments you might have would be welcome. Lyrl Talk C 22:10, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rejection rate


The article Rejection rate has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "WP:NOTDICT"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vahurzpu (talk) 06:26, 14 November 2020 (UTC)