User talk:Azuredivay

Welcome!
Hello, Azuredivay, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Nicky mathew (talk) 22:06, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Overlinking
Please follow WP:OVERLINK. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 22:34, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Some links I think you should reinstate
I don't have time to fix all the problems. We don't need links to countries. We do need links to organisations and my revert removed some of those, but we should not have their names in quotes. If there's no article, the name is all we need. I don't want you to think that all of your links were wrong. But just insert them, don't revert please. Hindu saints is a good one too. I see that my revert reinstated a link to guerilla which I don't think you should have removed. Doug Weller talk 11:23, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice
—  Newslinger  talk   06:39, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at HAL Tejas. ''You've been asked/warned about adding duplicate links to articles and adding links to common terms. You need to pay attention to this.'' BilCat (talk) 05:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Got it. Azuredivay (talk) 09:23, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pakistani nationalism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jammu and Kashmir ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Pakistani_nationalism check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Pakistani_nationalism?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

AE
I have initiated a discussion at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard about some of your edits. The thread is Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. Vanamonde (Talk) 04:19, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Regarding your edits on Reliance Industries
I appreciate the effort to introduce Indian currency formatting, however refrain from doing so in the infobox by removing the INRConvert template. This brings about a lack of standardization across articles about Indian companies. If you wish to bring about a lasting change in this matter I reccomend putting in a message on the talk page of the INRConvert template.  Debit pixie 💬 13:52, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Regarding logo of Serum Institute of India
Hi, thank you for your contributions. I would like you to inform that the logo you uploaded on commons File:Serum-institute-of-india-logo.png does not have proper licencing, so its liable to be deleted. I have updated the image that has proper copyright licence tag. See File:Serum-Institute-of-India-logo.png. Please go through/read Wikipedia:Logos policy and to avoid such mistakes in future. Thank you. ~ Amkgp 💬  14:29, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Minor
Please read wp:minor a recent edit of yours was marked as minor and was not.Slatersteven (talk) 12:15, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Bangladesh Liberation War
Looks like we are nearing a consensus. Won't you make a comment now? Aditya (talk • contribs) 05:17, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Jio; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.    Pro lix 💬 17:56, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Jio.    Pro lix 💬 18:08, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Edits to Stan Swamy
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vikram Vincent 19:47, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Information orange.svg Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Stan Swamy, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Vikram Vincent 20:01, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

MOS
You have been told to stop editing pages contrary to the manual of style multiple times. You have been warned multiple times but you continue to edit war and ignore attempts to gain consensus. This is your final opportunity to explain your actions.  Pro lix 💬 06:17, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * User:Azuredivay is indulging in disruptive editing across multiple pages and refuses to stop despite multiple requests. Vikram Vincent 11:59, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , thanks for letting me know. The user has been reported on ANEW kindly add your comments on the page under the appropriate section.  Pro lix 💬 12:40, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.  Pro lix 💬 12:38, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Vikram Vincent 08:44, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * You've been blocked 48 hours for continuing to impose your own style preference on numbers in articles, contrary to the guideline at MOS:DIGITS. This follows my previous warning at WP:AN3. See the new AN discussion here. This block can be lifted if you will promise to follow our style guideline in the future. You can also appeal the block using the instructions at WP:GAB. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:58, 22 October 2020 (UTC)


 * It was my misunderstanding that a minor edit would be uncontroversial but now after going through MOS:DIGITS and why the guideline was originally created, I understand that I had to gain consensus first. I'll ensure that from now on I will use talk page instead of edit warring over MOSDIGITS and abide by WP:BRD. Azuredivay (talk) 03:36, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * OK, I've unblocked you on the assurance you will wait for consensus in the future before changing number formats. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 15:18, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Karchana. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. ''Do not change WP:COMMONNAME, which is Allahabad in Wikipedia. Do not be disruptive.'' Fylindfotberserk (talk) 06:42, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Do not add Indian scripts in lead and infobox either. Follow WP:NOINDICSCRIPT. No honorifics as per WP:NCIN, MOS:DOCTOR. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 06:45, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Maintain the WP:COMMONNAME of places please. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 06:34, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Sock puppet
Please stop vandalising wikipedia. False accusations against me of being a sock puppet are not acceptable. I edit on here under my own name and have seen no evidence from you that the original edits were investigated and shown to be invalid. Deleting content and pointing at random WP policies do not make you correct. You have deleted any discussion on the topics talk page. This is not WP policy. The only deletions I have seen on talk pages are where profanity is used. Please point me at where your actions have been agreed upon. Brian R Hunter (talk) 10:38, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Edits to Hotstar and violations of the Manual of Style
Could you please explain your edits here? They contradict the Manual of Style, including the removal of quotes around statements made by others, use of Indian decimal systems, italization of proper names, and removal of the definite article from country names that take definite article. ViperSnake151  Talk  05:18, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason.  Please refrain from disruptive changes against Manual of Style, like WP:COMMONNAME, MOS:JOBTITLES — DaxServer (talk to me) 08:29, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Hello, I'm Passengerpigeon. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to the page Statue of Unity because it appeared to have removed negative or disparaging information that was correctly sourced. Please note that Wikipedia has a neutral point of view and must cover controversies relating to particular topics as well as positive aspects; removal of accurate negative information from an article could be seen as POV pushing. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!  Passenger pigeon  ( talk )  01:38, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

New message from Passengerpigeon
 Passenger pigeon  ( talk )  13:01, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Edits to Statue of Unity without discussion
Please refrain from reverting edits without any discussion. I've been waiting for replies on articles Talk page for over a month. Instead of replying on the Talk page, you simply chose to revert the edit based on what you think is right. You've pushed an entire section containing the plight of the tribals negatively affected because of the project under "Construction" section which absolutely makes no sense. This type of suppressing or minimizing all the negative aspects of any subject constitutes POV pushing. --coolk (talk) 19:26, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Important Notice
Tayi Arajakate Talk 19:20, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Statue of Unity
Two of your edits - diff and diff could only be termed, with a lot of WP:AGF, as weakly explained. I request you to please heed the DS notice above and previous requests to use talk page before such removals. hemantha (brief) 04:22, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 * You've reverted material twice now (see this as an Edit War notice, I don't want to template). There's enough consensus in talk archives that criticism section is warranted in that article. Your repeated removal without any talk consensus isn't productive. hemantha (brief) 08:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

WP:COMMONNAME
You had enough warnings regarding WP:COMMONNAME. The next time you violate this, as in with the change from Gurgaon to Gurugram, I will start a discussion at WP:ANI.--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 15:34, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Use edit summaries to explain the changes you make
Edit summaries are required per policy, see Editing policy. In controversial articles like Ayurveda, you shouldn't make changes without any explanation. Hemantha (talk) 10:52, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

How to use quotations
Addition of quote in this edit is misleading and grammatically incorrect. Quotations are used for direct speech, not indirect speech. The text you copy-pasted was an already paraphrased summary of the content from the original source (litigator), otherwise they put that in quotes. If you quote that, the readers would misread it as the direct voice of the litigator. Additionally, that Oneindia reference fails WP:RS as I already mentioned in talk. The Doom Patrol (talk) 21:20, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi, Thanks for your Edit. Can you explain why you remove the link ? all the link provided that is after 2016. But my reference from 2013. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nangeli — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hellodasan (talk • contribs) 14:59, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Please, stop removing "the" before "United States"
Azuredivay, I urge you to stop removing "the" before "United States" in Wikipedia articles (for instance, in "Ratanakosin-class corvette": diff1, diff2). It's grammatically incorrect. Russian Rocky (talk) 17:02, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

CS1 error on Tibetan Terrier
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Tibetan Terrier, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/sandbox/43&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Azuredivay&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1165609204 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:14, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tibetan_Terrier&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1165609204%7CTibetan%20Terrier%5D%5D Ask for help])

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Undone revert to Indian National Army
Hello Azure. I have undone your reversion to the page Indian National Army. I dont know what you mean by whitewashing, but the page as it mostly stands was written in painstaking neutral language over the last 15 years, and as mentioned in the edit summaries, hoisting "collaborator" as a pejorative adjective(I suspect that is the intention) is a very biased PoV which stands at marked against Indian perspective of this organisation. I would invite you to discuss in the talk page, or seek a comment or third opinion if you feel your emphasis is not covered adequately in the article (the view of collabroators vs freedom fighters is covered in the very introduction. Happy to hear and discuss further. Best wishes rueben_lys (talk · contribs) 18:06, 17 July 2024 (UTC)