User talk:Azurinj

Welcome!
Hello, Azurinj, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! ← †@πωεεṝ   ♥  @ me   05:29, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Speedy deletion nomination of Digital dementia


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Digital dementia, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mkdw talk 07:38, 24 April 2013 (UTC)


 * As reviewing administrator, I have declined the speedy-deletion nomination because I do not think this is a hoax; but it does not seem to me to be an encyclopedia article either, rather a personal essay with some "how-to" advice, so I have proposed it for deletion - see formal notice below.


 * You said on the talk page that this is a class project: please ask your instructor to look at School and university projects.


 * Some pages which will help to explain why, in its present form, this is not suitable for Wikipedia:


 * WP:NOTESSAY: Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought
 * WP:Verifiability: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source."
 * WP:No original research which includes: "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce such a discovery" and " Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources."
 * WP:NOTHOWTO
 * There is good general advice at WP:Your first article. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 09:36, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Digital dementia


The article Digital dementia has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * this cites no references and appears to be original research; also, Wikipedia is not a how-to guide.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 09:36, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Digital dementia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Digital dementia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Digital dementia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.