User talk:B-Fir3

October 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:57, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jennifer Fabes
Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 05:31, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you add defamatory content once again, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 05:32, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 05:36, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jennifer Fabes
A tag has been placed on Jennifer Fabes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 05:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Jennifer Fabes (Student Teacher)"
A page you created, Jennifer Fabes (Student Teacher), has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it serves only to attack some entity. Please do not continue to create attack pages, as you will be blocked from editing.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. miquonranger03 (talk) 05:09, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Account blocked
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Image copyright problem with File:BrentonMat95.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:BrentonMat95.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:32, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Favor: Send me a deleted page please!
Re your message: Sorry, but I will not provide a copy of an attack article for you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:44, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Nor will I. The only thing I'll say is that I could have also easily deleted the second half of that page as a copyright violation since you also copied and pasted all the content from that subject's home page. And no, I'm not giving you a link to that website on this forum; you'll have to look it up yourself. Regards. Zzyzx11 (talk) 11:22, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Re your message: My answer remains the same. I will not restore or provide a copy of any attack article.  Do not ask again. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:39, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I've declined your request at WP:REFUND This has already been declined above by the two deleting administrators. Please review our policy regarding pages about real people and the other help pages. The chance you still have here, is to contribute constructively to building an encyclopedia. But if you don't drop this matter now, you'll be blocked for disruption. --Tikiwont (talk) 09:28, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * With respect to your subsequent note, that i only noticed now, let me say that I personally accept your apology and have sufficient good faith to doubt that you would recreate it. If you were still ill-meaning you could create a similar page anyways. The door here is still open as well. The reason that I cannot extend that kindness beyond replying you here to giving you actually the page back is different one: your insistence on having it back for personal reasons that I do not know ar want to know, is something quite different than remorse or earnestness and restoring it would not only be contrary to our policy but be more than unkind to Ms Fabes. Sooner or later, you'll realize that this here isn't about 'your work' at all, and won't need the page anymore. --Tikiwont (talk) 20:29, 19 March 2011 (UTC)