User talk:B0rk

Vanity articles
Please don't create articles about yourself or your friends. We're building an encyclopedia here, and it's very unlikely that your article fits in with that. Creating such articles also makes work for others as we rush to delete them. The Wikipedia policy on vanity articles can be reviewed here and here and the reason your article was deleted can be reviewed here. If you need any more information about this, please visit this page. Thanks.➨ ❝ R E  DVERS ❞ 14:11, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Please stop
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. ➨ ❝ R E  DVERS ❞ 14:12, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Real person
I'm a real person, but a somewhat busy one with other things to do rather than chat. But if you have a specific Wikipedia-related question you'd like to ask, please go ahead and I'll be happy to. Go to my talk page and carefully follow the instructions in the yellow boxes at the top of the page. ➨ ❝ R E  DVERS ❞ 14:24, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Dualistic development
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Dualistic development, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 02:12, 29 December 2007 (UTC)