User talk:B49

June 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from WNYW. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AgentCDE / Talk / 03:04, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

You seem to be splitting off a lot of content. Why? I'd suggest noting your reasoning in edit summaries if you continue working on this.--AgentCDE / Talk / 03:07, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

if channel 2 have it like that, why can't abc have it? it have an equal right.

WABC-TV
Please stop editing this article, as your changes were unnecessary. The news personalities section should have not been split-off into its own article, and is now being considered for deletion. And there is no reason to place Meredith Viera's name in the fire paragraph (she has nothing to do with the fire or Live with Regis and Kelly's using the Millionaire studio), or the redundant wikifiying in the caption for the '92 Eyewitness News screen cap. These changes will be reverted, and if you feel they should be warranted you'll need to expain yourself. Rollosmokes 17:49, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

"News Team" pages
There is also no need to split-off news/current personality sections of television station articles into their own page, as you did with WABC-TV News Team, WCBS-TV News Team, WNYW-TV News Team, and KHOU-TV News Team. The information is better served within the main article, and creating a new page violates both Fancruft (the subject matter interests only a small group and not a wider scope of the Wikipedia community) and Notability. All of these pages you've created are now up for deletion. Please do not create more. Rollosmokes 21:11, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

RE:"Steve Bartelstein, who was dropped... due to incompetence."
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, your recent edits to Ken Rosato have been reverted as they could be seen to be defamatory or potentially libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Rrburke(talk) 23:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

RE: "Kai Simonsen lives in New Jersey with his ugly wife"
Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Kai Simonsen. If you would like to experiment please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Rrburke(talk) 23:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Dave Evans (reporter) and other recent articles
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Accounts used solely for blatant self-promotion may be blocked indefinitely without further warning.

For more details, please read the Conflict of Interest guideline. --CliffC 03:20, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Ryan Carnes
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ryancarnes.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ryancarnes.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:10, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Chris Wragge WCBS.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Chris Wragge WCBS.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:54, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Ryancarnes.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ryancarnes.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:17, 21 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Extraordinary Machine 13:17, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Ryancarnes.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ryancarnes.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Extraordinary Machine 13:17, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Edward Vidaurre
An article that you have been involved in editing, Edward Vidaurre, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you. -- Flyguy649 talk 06:07, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Nomination of Kai Simonsen for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kai Simonsen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kai Simonsen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr Potto (talk) 12:06, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Andre Hepkins


The article Andre Hepkins has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:22, 17 January 2020 (UTC)