User talk:B4ao001

Proposed deletion of Krystal Evette


The article Krystal Evette has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Jmertel23 (talk) 01:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Sandboxes again
I asked you here what was the purpose of the 20+ sandboxes. You declined to answer (here) and as they do not appear to be involved in improving Wikipedia I have deleted them. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:05, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 02:09, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Krystal Evette
Hello, B4ao001. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Krystal Evette, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Sandbox--again
So here we are again, and "I am minding my business and I just want to be left alone in my own corner and just experiment" really just isn't good enough: you're not just experimenting, you're hoaxing about imaginary concerts in 2022. This is the third time that your sandbox gets flagged for violating WP:NOTWEBHOST, and I'm pinging and, who previously considered you in violation. So here is the thing: unless your edits in such a sandbox very clearly indicate that you are working on an article, you can't do what you're doing. And I note also that in your career here the number of sandbox edits outweighs the article edits by a factor of 20 or so, and that is just not a good balance. Please be mindful of WP:NOTHERE. Drmies (talk) 00:03, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The user is not going to change. They have made one edit to this Talk page, and that was to remove CambridgeBayWeather's question about sandboxes. Beyond that, the user has not communicated anywhere on Wikipedia. Collaborative is apparently not part of their temperament. So, my view is a NOTHERE block is called for now. If you think that's too harsh or premature, I'll bow out.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:20, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh,, I didn't notice that--I was wondering where those questions were. Good point. But I'm leaning toward not blocking since they have, in the last month, made an effort to actually do some article work. YMMV. Drmies (talk) 00:21, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 * So, and, honestly I didn't know about my talk page. I am super new to Wikipedia, at the same time as not being new. At first I was just truly experimenting around with Wikipedia and exploring the format. I truly didn't know what I was doing, but now I do. I would like to apologize for me not properly reading the guidelines, or the rules. I think I was just trying to be in my own world, and that is not possible on such a serious thing. I would also like to clarify why I deleted a comment on this talk page. I thought everyone would go away, and they didn't. I still don't know how to properly do this, but I will try my hardest. From now on I will no longer do what I was doing, and from now on I will try to be actually beneficial to Wikipedia and try to no longer breaking web host rules. I apologize. B4ao001 (talk) 00:48, 20 August 2021 (UCT)
 * It's one talk page edit, 153 article (includes sandbox moved to article and then to draft) and 1990 sandbox edits. I don't object to blocking or a final warning. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:59, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 * B4ao001, I hope you understand what is expected from you here: to start working on some articles. OK? Drmies (talk) 01:12, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I understand. Again, I take full accountability. B4ao001 (talk) 01:22, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Krystal Evette


Hello, B4ao001. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Krystal Evette".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:20, 22 January 2022 (UTC)