User talk:B7T

Gokrida
Don't worry, this isn't anything personal and I didn't stumble upon the article via you but by via one of the categories the article is in. --Sloane 16:45, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

I wasn't really thinking it was. Not a problem. B7T 19:00, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Re : GoKrida AfD relist; browser-based games policy/guidelines
Yeah, there's very few voters for AfD these days, which is why some AfD don't seem to get much response even after a week or so. I decided to keep away from direct voting for AfD at the moment, as per the principle that AfD closers should not be an adovacy for or aganist the article itself (for impartiality). - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 15:08, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm interested in adding book sources to articles.
I've added ISBN numbers to books mentioned in articles before, with a link to the special page allowing you to find a copy of that book; but I've noticed that there are a number of articles where no number was given. Now it's possible that this is because there are several editions of a book, but it may be that people are unaware of this feature of Wikipedia. Is there a WikiProject for people interested in adding this feature to articles that mention books or other media with ISBN numbers? Are there other standards used in addition to ISBN numbers, like Library of Congress catalog card numbers, record company catalog numbers, or UPC codes? Can you direct me to any relevant articles for Wikipedia editors? B7T (talk) 17:41, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Did you check out WP:ISBN and Book Sources Legosock (talk) 18:23, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Biography Assesment Requests
Hey, found your assesment for your Pu Ru article on the Biography:Assessment page, but a better place might be here: Requesting an assessment69.92.175.16 (talk) 04:48, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Deleted userpages
FYI, if you have a need to delete your own user pages/subpages in future, you can use db-userreq, which will draw admins' attention to your request more quickly than plain old db. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 21:53, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Laugh track
Just wanted to say "thank you" for your work in the laugh track article (TOC right template to eliminate whitespace/scrolling). Much appreciated.Oanabay04 (talk) 15:02, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of I like pie for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I like pie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/I like pie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... disco spinster   talk  01:55, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mark Surman


The article Mark Surman has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. red dog six (talk) 04:13, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Universal Space for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Universal Space is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Universal Space until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:08, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Merger discussion for KidZui
An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash;KidZui&mdash;has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Mrwoogi010 &#9993;  16:59, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of List of fictional nannies for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fictional nannies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of fictional nannies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Killer Moff- ill advisedly sticking his nose in since 2011 (talk) 15:44, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of PivotX for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PivotX is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/PivotX until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.  Delta  space 42 (talk • contribs) 16:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

WIkiProject Doctor Who Newsletter: July 2024
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 20 July 2024 (UTC)