User talk:BALPA

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:53, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Here are a few key questions:
 * Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
 * Do you understand conflict of interest?
 * Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable?

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the 3 important principles above. Daniel Case (talk) 00:00, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

In answer to your questions:

Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory? Yes. BALPA is not a business, it is a Professional Association. Furthermore it is a registered UK Trade Union and is therefore classified as a not for profit organization.

Do you understand conflict of interest? Yes. Generally, encyclopedia articles focus on factual information to cover the thing or concept for which the article name stands. This a true reflection of the article which has been updated. All statements have been referenced and none pertain to 'promotion'.

Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable? Yes. There is absolutely no question that BALPA is not considered notable.

I will continue to be mindful of the 3 important principles above.
 * Alright then ... So, if we unblock you, how will you contribute? Daniel Case (talk) 21:29, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

To be perfectly honest, I don't think I will contribute to the page in question any further. I would like to offer an update to the history of that page as it is inaccurate, as per the relevant talk messages. However, as you suggest, I could be in a position of conflict of interest by updating it. It's a real shame as I could ultimately be the only person with the accurate history, but due to the conflict of interest rule it can't be updated. That's a shame for Wikipedia as the page will be inaccurate. I understand the reasons for conflict of interest but we're not talking self-promotion here, we're talking honestly sourced and referenced material, which should only be a good thing as the Wiki page is then up to date. However, I do understand the rule and I am sure many abuse it.

I'd rather just not lose the edits to the name. That is all.