User talk:BBCWatcher

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! , SqueakBox 19:04, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

EBCDIC
Why do you say this?


 * "It has no technical advantage over ASCII-based code pages such as the ISO-8859 series or Unicode, although for some time programmers appreciated the ease with which they could write case-insensitive EBCDIC sort routines. (EBCDIC places each uppercase and lowercase character together in its code sequence table. ASCII has two separate ranges for uppercase and lowercase characters. This difference is also the likely historical reason why mainframe operating systems have case-insensitive file systems and UNIX/UNIX-like operating systems do not.)"

If you look at the code page layout in the EBCDIC article (EBCDIC) you'll see that lower case letters are in the range 81-A9 and upper case letters are from C1 through E9, so they are not together in the code sequence table.

I'll watch this page so you can respond here if you'd like. --JeffW 13:52, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Hercules and IBM patents
I don't know if you're watching my talk page or not, so I'll put this here, too:

I think that nobody inside IBM cares about pursuing any patent claims against Hercules, and I've been told that they've actually decided that they would not. I've also been told that, before they bailed out of the mainframe world altogether, Amdahl researched the issue, and came to the conclusion that a software emulator would not violate any of IBM's patents. I further believe that pursuing such a claim would severely damage their credibility in the open source world, something they've spent a lot of time, energy, and money establishing.

There's been a LOT of FUD slung at Hercules by one particular industry analyst, to the point that everyone's wondering just what axe he's grinding. This is his major contention. Nobody else - and this includes lots of folks I've spoken with, both inside and outside IBM - thinks it's an issue.

I believe that casting doubt on the legality of running Linux for z/Series on Hercules violates NPOV, since it's definitely one person's POV that there's any problem at all.

Thanks for the comments... Jay Maynard 23:50, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

PhostrEx
Thought you might like to contribute to this article. --Ng.j 22:47, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:IBM-System-z9.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:IBM-System-z9.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Merge of Category:ESA/390 mainframe technology and  Category:ZSeries mainframe technology
Hello, I am quite opposed to this merge. Some time ago, I created 4 such categories, ranging from S/360 to zSeries, because the original page was real mess, and it confused 40 years old technologies with the latest ones. So I sorted the technologies into these. The pages for S/360 and S/370 are apparently gone now, and now you merged even those two. Also, most things there have been gone I don't know where. I hope you realize that S/390 and zSeries are very different machines. It's "nice" to see my own work in vain. By the way, the Category:IBM Mainframe computer operating systems is a mess too - it contains purely historical things, different old operating systems, parts of newest z/OS, and things as access registers that should go to zSeries category, since they are not tied to any OS. Samohyl Jan (talk) 07:28, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

z/OS Release History section
Hey there. Do you have any sources to back up the additional content you added? While I think it all sounds correct, it could be reverted as original research unless you go back in and cite some reliable sources. Thanks for your help. --TreyGeek (talk) 13:29, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

IBM Secure Execution moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, IBM Secure Execution, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 12:41, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:IBM Secure Execution


Hello, BBCWatcher. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "IBM Secure Execution".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:16, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Batty Boy (Lil Nas X song) moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Batty Boy (Lil Nas X song). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. The Night Watch    (talk)   04:28, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Batty Boy (Lil Nas X song)
Hello, BBCWatcher. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Batty Boy (Lil Nas X song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Batty Boy (Lil Nas X song)


Hello, BBCWatcher. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Batty Boy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:24, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:CareShield Life
Hello, BBCWatcher. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:CareShield Life, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:CareShield Life


Hello, BBCWatcher. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "CareShield Life".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:11, 30 October 2023 (UTC)