User talk:BBeagle

Explaining
I patrolled your page. I went through the enormously-backlogged list of newly-created pages and confirmed that your page was okay: not spam, not an attack page, not a copyright violation, not any of the other reasons for which I would delete someone's page without asking. Then I clicked "patrolled" to remove it from the list of "pages that have not yet been patrolled", and moved on to the next entry. That's all. DS (talk) 13:33, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Madagascar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diego Suarez. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:43, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 17:42, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Hi BBeagle! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 17:42, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

The Daily Caller
There was a decision on 2019 not to use this as a source, see Reliable sources/Perennial sources so any edits using it should be deleted or resourced. Doug Weller talk 17:46, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Black Lives Matter
On my own initiative, I looked a bit further into this edit by which removed an insertion you had made to the Black Lives Matter article. That edit had an edit summary saying,. I just want to provide the additional information that Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources (WP:RSP) rates the Daily Caller as Deprecated, and explains the meaning of that term in relation to its ratings here. The key sentence from that explanation reads: "The source is considered generally unreliable, and use of the source is generally prohibited". Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 17:52, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)