User talk:BBiiis08

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 05:17, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Regarding this
Please note: this parameter and this parameter, which turns up coverage in reliable news and book sources. Please keep in mind Potential, not just current state. Thanks! Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 22:47, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


 * So add to the article and convince the others who want to delete it. BBiiis08 (talk) 00:02, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * It's a team effort. Once the sources have been found, then the AfD should be withdrawn and the article improved.  Deletion is a last resort after all.  Sincerley, --A NobodyMy talk 06:40, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Message of the Hour
Hello. I see you have redirected the article The Message of the Hour to William M. Branham, but you have not merged the content with Branhamism as was approved by the AFD. I have changed the article to redirect to Branhamism as was agreed to by consensus at AFD. Do you intend to soon add this information to the Branhamism article? Thanks Charles Edward (Talk) 18:27, 11 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for fixing that. I did add basic information about what it is, but will not merge entire/unsourced articles per weight/V concerns. BBiiis08 (talk) 22:27, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I have been working on this article in my sandbox and have been digging up refrences for the majority of the article. Once I am completed I intend to merge it into the Branhamism article. You can view it here. If you have time and would like to check it out, feel free to do so and let me know any concerns you have about referencing and I will try to address it before I place the content back into the main space. Thanks Charles Edward (Talk) 23:02, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sinauer Associates
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sinauer Associates, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BoomerAB (talk) 00:27, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

List of close elections
Please remember that WP:AFD is for deletions only. If you want part of the material to be retained, then you cannot delete its history. See [[Wikipedia:Merge and delete]]. In this case, I think discussing at WP:MRFD would've been a better option for the goal you had in mind. Just remember that mergers are followed with redirects and not deletions. - Mgm|(talk) 11:06, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jack Tar Hotels
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jack Tar Hotels, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The article is unencyclopedic, and its importance is unclear.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Drunauthorized (talk) 15:02, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:911ct supporters
Template:911ct supporters has been nominated for deletion by Ice Cold Beer. As this TfD nomination includes objections to the same list of people that is currently in use in Template:911ct, I am inviting you to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. (I am sending this message to you as a current or former editor of Aaron Russo, following the guideline on multiple messages.) Regards —  Cs32en  10:58, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Bob Lazar
Your revision of 02:20, 24 May 2009 is in infraction of []: contentious material about living persons. Whether the material is negative, positive, or just questionable — (it) should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion. DeltaT (talk) 17:17, 27 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I suggest you read WP:BLP and quote things IN CONTEXT. BLP reads: "Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion". Are you saying two articles in the Los Angeles Times, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Newsweek, Albuquerque Tribune, and Wired are poor sources?
 * As another person mentioned to you already, stop white washing the article. BBiiis08 (talk) 17:46, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Georgia Purdom
I have nominated Georgia Purdom, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Georgia Purdom. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 13:49, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

AfD of article you worked on
Please see: Articles for deletion/Richard Sternberg.Wolfview (talk) 10:57, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)