User talk:BBoyNeptune06

Imperial Music Group moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Imperial Music Group, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 02:34, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Edits to the article Kelvin Taylor (actor).
Hello BBoyNeptune06,

I am leaving you a message regarding your edits to the article Kelvin Taylor (actor). I have been an editor on Wikipedia for nearly 14 years and generally (day to day) do minor fixes. While I was cleaning out the container category African-American actors and placing all lingering articles into the more specific categories (African-American actresses and African-American male actors), I came across the article on Kevin Taylor. I refined, added and corrected several of the categories: adding People from Hampton, Virginia, 21st-century American male actors, and placed the article into the more specific African-American male actors category, rather than the generic container category African-American actors. I also deleted (as you know) the categories Australian actors and New Zealand actors, which you reverted. I corrected this again and added American emigrants to Australia, which you have reverted again and accused me (as well as other Wiki editors) of vandalizing the page. So, here are a few thoughts:


 * I am not vandalizing the article page. I was improving the references. Please assume good faith before accusing editors of vandalizing pages. I am not a vandal, wasn't vandalizing the page, and neither were several other editors. I was correcting and refining the categories.
 * The subject you keep adding the categories Australian actors and New Zealand actors to is neither an Australian or a New Zealand citizen. It is Wiki policy that categories describe a subject's nationality. You can not ascribe someone a nationality that they are not. If the subject has Australian or New Zealand citizenship, or was born there, I could see justifying using these categories. However, given the referencing, this does not seem to be the case. He is an American actor who happens to live/work in Australia (and therefore an American emigrant to Australia). This does not make him an Australian or New Zealand actor. That isn't Wiki policy, and is frankly, just bad and/or false editing. I have lived in many countries throughout my life for extended periods and I am still an Estonian. I currently live the United States; that does not make me an "American Wiki editor".
 * Your reverting keeps deleting factual categories, as mentioned above: American emigrants to Australia, People from Hampton, Virginia, and 21st-century American male actors. If someone is born in Hope, Virginia, they are from Hope, Virginia. If someone from the U.S. emigrates to Australia, they are American emigrants to Australia. If someone is acting in the 21st-century, by any logical reasoning, they are a 21st-century actor. Your addition of People from Virginia Beach, Virginia is acceptable, as it seems the subject was raised there. The Australia and New Zealand actor categories don't belong there.
 * Lastly, please read through the "welcome" message above on your talk page. It seems possible that you may be violating Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy. COI editing is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia. If not, my apologies.

As it is, I am once again refining the categories. Sincerely, ExRat (talk) 23:00, 19 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello BBoyNeptune06,


 * Thank you for your response on my talk page. Firstly, if I came across as in any way rude or condescending above, that was never my intent. I only pointed out that I had been a Wiki editor for nearly 14 years because you are a newer editor and I wanted you to know that I wasn't some random "vandal" who has some habit of adding categories to pages simply to disturb them. This is now the third time you have accused me "vandalizing" the page. Secondly, by the sources and references given on the article Kelvin Taylor, he is not an Australian or New Zealand citizen. He is someone who has lived/lives and worked/works there. I was simply trying to explain that Wiki policy generally categorizes people by their actual nationality or status - not by my perspective. It is not "my perspective" or my own "personal definition" that the subject is an American citizen; it is an actual legal definition and generally Wikipedia's policy to categorize people by their nationality; not by what nationality they feel they are. Do you have a reference or source that states that Kelvin Taylor is an Australian or New Zealand citizen? What I have contributed to the United States and my tax status have nothing to do with this article or discussion. By law, I am Estonian. I can live and work in many countries, that doesn't negate my legal citizenship. Lastly, how am I in possibly violation of Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy? I have never met Kelvin Taylor and have absolutely no ties to the subject whatsoever. You have made remarks in the edit sections that seem that you possibly have a personal connection to him. ExRat (talk) 02:25, 20 June 2019 (UTC)


 * BBoyNeptune06,
 * I really do not understand your hostility. Again, if I am coming across as somehow belittling you or being rude, I am honestly sorry. All I was initially trying to do was place all of the African-American actors entries into more specific categories, I even added categories to the Kelvin Taylor (actor) category to try and be helpful. This has become ridiculous. I haven't reverted your edit, or made any other edit to the article. Nor have I called you a "bad editor". I stated that your addition of two categories was a bad edit per Wiki guidelines. Now you are personally attacking me on my talk page. For the record, I AM currently in the United States (Pennsylvania, to be exact). I have no idea what that has to do with anything. I raised the COI issue because it is a valid issue. We can leave it at this, or take it to arbitration if you like. ExRat (talk) 04:19, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Kelvin Taylor (actor)
Hello,. You have new messages at Talk:Kelvin Taylor (actor). You may [ remove this notice] at any time by removing the newmessages template. Chubbles (talk) 00:39, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kelvin Taylor (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BAPE ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Kelvin_Taylor_%28actor%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Kelvin_Taylor_%28actor%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Please review WP:CONTEXTBIO
We only put one nationality in the lead sentence of a biography. Per policy, that is the nationality or residence held at the time the person became notable. It doesn't change if they more elsewhere after that. Skyerise (talk) 10:42, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Justin Alliman


A tag has been placed on Justin Alliman, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Alliman. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

 You appear to have a close connection to the subject on Wikipedia that raises concerns about a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged.

Anyone with a conflict of interest must avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure. Even if you are not being paid, you are expected to disclose any close connection with the subject of the article, using the connected contributor template.

For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. Thank you. Deb (talk) 10:30, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi Deb,

I have no connection to the person in the article in any capacity. Thanks for the information on Conflict of Interest. However, you do not have basis for the implication of claim. My interest in the article was understanding of the story of Raymond Alliman.

Also, expression of interest in a article is not having a close relationship with said person. Engaging in discussions surrounding deletion when asking for context should not be an issue.

The only issue I have seen when asking for context on the implication of “unambiguous promotion” was being demeaned for doing so. Now you’ve replied to me on a thread “implying” about me bc I asked a question. All of which can be cited as abuse.

Writers, editors, creators are sensitive about their work and anyone putting time and effort into knowing an article or subject would feel disheartened to have their work deleted. All I asked was for context on how the article “seemed” to be unambiguous promotion? I can also state what it seems on my end, is that the person deleted the article not bc of sources, but bc of the history of said article being deleted previous and that’s not an excuse the article can not be updated or improved. This is also with no knowledge of the previous creator of the page, their history or documents in text to appear any similar in nature. I would like to edit more on the site to contribute in effective and effective ways but this place does not regulate “abuse” from long standing users who operate with impunity. Not to say this is you, but people are very disrespectful here in a cyber bullying nature that is toxic on the level of Twitter. BBoyNeptune06 (talk) 11:10, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Also by way, none of this applies to me.

editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with, (I do not know this person)

participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors (I do not have an organisation or a competitor)

linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); (I haven’t linked any articles or websites of any organisation)

and you must always: avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography. (Point of views were neutral and fact based) BBoyNeptune06 (talk) 11:15, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Btw, this is the 3rd time I’ve worked on a page and someone has came at me with “you seem to have a close connection to the subject”

Not sure why this is a “go to”. You are a writer I am assuming. It’s about effort and time, the knowledge around the person you also apply. Not complicated to comprehend on a grounded level. BBoyNeptune06 (talk) 11:26, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:Athaenara, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:16, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Information icon4.svg There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.PRAXIDICAE🌈 22:04, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. stwalkerster (talk) 22:03, 7 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.  If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.   – Athaenara  ✉  00:19, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I rolled back your last four edits because you had removed Praxidicae's notice of the WP:ANI#BBoyNeptune06, NPA, legal threats discussion. – Athaenara  ✉  00:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Legal threat withdrawn. Personal attacks continue. Not unblocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:22, 17 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1105 -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:25, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Is there a link to the images(?) of which user speaks so vehemently? Best, -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:29, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * You'll have to remind me with some context and preferably a diff. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:30, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thik i found them -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:45, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Still curious what you were referring to though. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:10, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Up at arms cause a bot removed his unsuitable images. Seems to hold you in low regard. And anyone who says, "no." (SMDH). The ANI says it all. --  Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:14, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I mean I tagged his images for deletion bc they were copyvios, so I assume it was that. And also that's why he's blocked from commons. PRAXIDICAE🌈  19:15, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:16, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * On reflection, anyone can be upset by an untoward turn of events, and in that regard, I sympathize. Having said that, I will go on to say that my impression is that this user is WP:NOTCOMPATIBLE with a collaborative project. Sure, when one of my first attempts at page creation was deleted (using since abandoned account cause real name), I was incrediblypissed. I was outraged. I did not, however, go on a rage attack directed at the NPP who tagged it and the admin who deleted it. I got ahold of myself, and got over it, and went on. So, unless this user shows a change of attitude and temperament, I can not see them being a constructive member of this project. --  Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:27, 17 August 2022 (UTC)