User talk:BE172-08

Restoring AFD-deleted articles
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:03, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

October 2022

 * BE172-08, in 54757 you were told your only pathway back to editing is the standard offer. Do you realise how the standard offer works? Per Standard offer:

Simply waiting six months and creating a new account isn't following the terms, it's sockpuppetry. DatGuyTalkContribs 17:16, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Contact a willing administrator or experienced editor (via your user talk page, email,  or WP:UTRS).
 * 2) If they agree a review is appropriate, they'll open a thread at an administrative noticeboard (ideally Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard).
 * 3) Wait a few days for the discussion to conclude

Yamla, how do I prove that I am not a sockpuppet? BE172-08 (talk) 22:49, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The technical data, combined with your behavior makes it abundantly clear that you are indeed evading a block, so there's no real point in trying to "prove" that you are not. In your UTRS appeal in October one of your pledges was to "...completely ignore the page I was edit warring on Seneca Ridge Middle School and I will never try to edit that page again." That and your dishonesty here doesn't bode well for a WP:STANDARDOFFER. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 23:24, 28 October 2022 (UTC)


 * This isn't a court of law. The technical evidence plus WP:DUCK behavior is quite sufficient here. Also note that I've protected that redirect to prevent future attempts. OhNo itsJamie Talk 23:47, 3 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Having multiple unblock requests open from different sock accounts (as well as an now-closed UTRS ticket under Ellidon217) is not a good strategy. Now that you've dropped the silly pretenses, I suggest you close both of these and appeal from your original account. I will also note here (and in future unblock requests) that in February of this year you declared "I, Ellidon217, do hereby promise and declare the following. 1. I will completely ignore the page I was edit warring on Seneca Ridge Middle School and I will never try to edit that page again," so I'm not particularly confident in your ability to drop that stick. OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:19, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note to administrators: I request that if you unblock me, you unblock this account specifically, as it is the account I have the most progress on. I have closed my appeals on other accounts. Also, I could not "pick up that stick" so to speak, now that the page has been restricted to admin only access. Thanks, BE172-08 (talk) 17:48, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Can I please have my talk page access returned as Ellidon217 then? BE172-08 (talk) 21:22, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 * You're familiar with WP:UTRS, as you made an unblock request their earlier this year where you promised to stay away from the Seneca Middle School page. OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:35, 7 November 2022 (UTC)