User talk:BEST STAR 907

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 12:39, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 15:30, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 16:53, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! RadioFan (talk) 16:47, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
RadioFan (talk) 13:09, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! j⚛e deckertalk 15:03, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:18, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

advice
as an experienced administrator here, I re-reviewed the sequence of reviews on this article. I think it only fair to tell you that I do not think we are ever likely to accept it. If by chance some editor moved it into mainspace, it would be immediately nominated for AfD, and certainly deleted. As others have commented, the career is the example of ONEEVENT that we do not consider appropriate for an encyclopedia. The most rational thing for you to do at this point is to place at the top of the AfC a line reading : , and it will be quickly deleted. When the individual becomes later in his career actually notable, and you have the necessary material, then try again.  DGG ( talk ) 04:35, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I've also taken a look on your presentations for a Rutvik Oza article. Personally I am fascinated by the work he has done and he thrills me with his work in math, in film, in activism and in politics. I also benefited greatly from some of the references you provided about him. I think if you concentrate for example on Oza's scriptwriting aspect, after all he worked on a number of relevant films, it does save the article from the "One Event" argument. A brief checking of the name just shows a great number of films Rutvik Oza was in. That section can be developed further to highlight his work in films. I made a research on the name and just in English Wikipedia, you come up with at least ten mentions (surely an indication of notability in films) https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&search=Rutvik+Oza . I also note that you mention for example that he was a co-winner with Anurag Kashyap and Vikramaditya Motwane on the film Udaan. See Filmfare Award for Best Screenplay. One more suggestion and please, don't take this as a patronizing remark. I am not trying to be anyway... I don't know if you can edit in Hindi. Or if not, if you can actually collaborate with someone who does have knowledge editing in Hindi. We do have a Hindi Wikipedia https://hi.wikipedia.org/ . I tried to search for ऋत्विक ओझा on Hindi Wikipedia and ended up with nothing there. There must be a huge interest for a Rutvik Oza article in Hindi (I am just assuming there is no Hindi language article till now). It may not be as widespread as English Wikipedia, but there is a potential of readers in tens of millions to a Hindi Wikipedia and they are surely interested in Indian talents as Oza is. The same can be achieved with other Indian language pages as well including one in Gujarati, language of his home state. Meanwhile for the English language article, keep adding to the article in your own user page area for a future launching when there are new media coverage as per comments of our various editors or he wins prizes in mathematics or does further work to increase his notability. Many thanks for introducing this gentleman to us. I for one am richer for it thanks to Wikipedia and thanks to valuable contributions like yours. werldwayd (talk) 07:10, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Rutvik Oza for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rutvik Oza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rutvik Oza & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BDD (talk) 18:57, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rutvik Oza


The article Rutvik Oza has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Thoroughly fails WP:BIO and/or WP:NCREATIVE, having a resume and social media presence does not confer notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. § FreeRangeFrog croak 02:40, 30 April 2015 (UTC)