User talk:BErrIa9999

=I=

Gallery
I live in the UK. The UK is much safe. I wouldn’t go somwhere else. This is spacious! I visited these countries. They are exellent.

A userbox
Say hey! And greet to someone!

This is ‘‘‘X’’’! This is Example!!!

Poems
Here lives an ordinary queen, Your favourite colour is green, This is keen, It has not been, Woah! Woah! This has been a perfect story! How do you say “You know!” BErrIa9999 (talk) 20:22, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

The question
Am I extended-comfirmed? Yes.BErrIa9999 (talk) 20:21, 18 November 2017 (UTC) Am I anonymous? No.BErrIa9999 (talk) 20:21, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

The talk page
Hello! Be consectutive. BErrIa9999 (talk) 11:21, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks! BErrIa9999 (talk) 11:50, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I thought that this is a user page. BErrIa9999 (talk) 21:21, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I may have 500 edits. BErrIa9999 (talk) 21:22, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
 * This could even be a PC with Internet Explorer 11. BErrIa9999 (talk) 21:23, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I should be extended-comfirmed by now. BErrIa9999 (talk) 21:24, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh no to Wikipedia!BErrIa9999 (talk) 21:25, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Uh oh again! Wikipedia is not edit-free. BErrIa9999 (talk) 21:26, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Please stop monitrizing the Sandbox! Two more chances for you!BErrIa9999 (talk) 21:28, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
 * This is the future now. By me. We’re on ! BErrIa9999 (talk) 16:47, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I would have over a billion edits. BErrIa9999 (talk) 22:04, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If I have 100 edits, I would be comfirmed. Instead, I need to edit extended-comfirmed protected articles by now! BErrIa9999 (talk) 20:57, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, BErrIa9999, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Sandbox
Please stop trying to monopolize the Wikipedia:Sandbox. The Sandbox can be used by anyone, but nothing there is permanent, and it will always be periodically reset to its empty state.  General Ization  Talk   17:46, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm going ask you one (and only one) more time. Please leave the Sandbox alone.  Surely you can find better and more constructive ways to contribute to Wikipedia.  General Ization   Talk   18:38, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Your actions
Hello BErrla9999. I am writing here because i am rather concerned about what appears to be the pattern of your edits, and that pattern appears not to be constructive. You have made a huge number of edits to the SANDBOX, but not generally constructive, trials or tests, more looking like attempts to revert IP users and control the content ~ a hopeless task, as it is designed to have no permanent content. You have also spent a surprising amount of time editing where IPs from a very limited range (very possibly similar or the same as those you were interacting with in the sandbox) have been making silly changes, and you either revert them or aid them. Finally, of the edits you have made to articles only a very limited number seem to be helpful, actual changes which have stayed "live". I don't like to judge, but it very much looks as though you have been gaming the system, trying to achieve a certain number of edits within a short time; this is not necessarily a bad thing, but it is the sort of thing done by some editors who are not here to help, so reflects badly on you, even if your motives are pure. Also, though i am by no means an expert, i rather suspect that one or more of the IPs i refer to above are actually you, acting while logged out; if this is the case, i would suggest you don't do that any more.

Having said all that, the potentially nasty stuff, i would just like to emphasise that i and others are here to help, if you need it; you have only to ask. Happy days, LindsayHello 15:58, 19 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Reverting isn’t availble on mobile devices. It’s only on PC. BErrIa9999 (talk) 21:01, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Geo-stub
I'm not sure quite why you did, but i have reverted you; as you can see, if you look, there is already a stub template on the article, in the correct place (which is the very end); while it is permissable to have more than one stub template (though not especially common), they must be in the right place, and would not normally be duplicates of each other ~ as the template is a less specific one than  , the latter is to be preferred. Happy days, LindsayHello 22:00, 19 November 2017 (UTC)