User talk:BI5427

Unblock
I understand and condemn the two reasons I got blocked: Edit warring and creating a new account under the same IP. I have understood the basis of how the system in Wikipedia works. I’m going to continue making contributions as you’ve seen me do in this account (I’m not sure if you can monitor my work or not). BI5427 (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Unblock request
I, now, prefer working on Arabian history on the Arabic Wikipedia; This one is honestly too racist for my tolerance at the moment. Perhaps I’ll come back at a later time. BI5427 (talk) 20:19, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

this one*, excuse me on that. BI5427 (talk) 20:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Unblock Request
Hello, Nosebagbear! Kindly, review my new unblock request, cheers BI5427 (talk) 18:42, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Re:Unblock Request
Resulted to this block* BI5427 (talk) 18:08, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

‘’’Update’’’ I don’t have the password for the other accounts. BI5427 (talk) 18:43, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

BI5427 (talk) 16:55, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I understand your impatience, but there's no point in having an "adminhelp" template ad well as an unblock request. It may take some time, but the unblock request will be dealt with eventually. JBW (talk) 08:06, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Alright. BI5427 (talk) 14:05, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello again, the partial ban was half a year ago, and about the “hostile discussions”, there were none, me and a fellow editor were talking about disputed info about a character, with no edit warring, nothing, just engaging in dialogue until we reached consensus. BI5427 (talk) 16:31, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , that wasn't the impression I got, but maybe I was mistaken. I'll take another look tomorrow at those discussions. Girth Summit  (blether)  22:23, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Okay👍 BI5427 (talk) 00:39, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , I've looked again at the discussions on your talk page over there, and at this article talk page. I am relying on machine translation, so there is always the possibility that the translation is wrong, but I see you accusing an admin over there of being arrogant, and arguing at great length with two administrators about material you want to include, which they do not think should be in the article; by the end of that conversation one of them warns you that you are a drain on their time, and tells you that if you reinstate the content again, they will block your account. That does not look to me like the sort of editing that we want to see imported over here. I'm sorry, but you are going to have to build up a lengthy track-record of constructive, collaborative editing over there before anyone is likely to consider an unblock here. Girth Summit  (blether)  12:19, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

So is it because I argued once with an admin about certain material? As far as I know you could as much as you want as long as it’s considered constructive dialogue; I will admit that there was slight tension over the issue but it never included edit warring, blocks or anything close to that terminology. BI5427 (talk) 22:08, 6 June 2021 (UTC)