User talk:BIOGUM1979

August 2020
Hi BIOGUM1979! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Hard clam that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Having looked at every one of your edits, all of which have been marked as "minor", may I request that in future you only flag minor edits when they are genuinely so.  Nick Moyes (talk) 23:59, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Please also learn to cite references properly. This edit is very poor. Please read WP:REFBEGIN to understand how you should correctly add citations into Wikipedia articles.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Inonotus obliquus, you may be blocked from editing. ''Please stop inserting badly formatted content based on in vitro research. The edit is not encyclopedic. You should read WP:MOS on how to format content and WP:CIT on how to format a reference. Science references for Wikipedia should be reviews - see WP:SCIRS. Also, do not edit war, WP:WAR. You now exceed WP:3RR and may be blocked for disruptive editing and warring.'' Zefr (talk) 22:26, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.