User talk:BJBot/Archive 2

AfD notifications
Hello, BJBot. I appreciate your eagerness to notify authors of articles that I have listed for deletion. However, perhaps you should try to calm your subroutines down just a little bit and give me a few more minutes to do it myself. I added the AfD tag to Attorney Street (Manhattan) at 06:10 UTC, took a couple of minutes to write the AfD itself, posted it at 06:13 UTC , added it to the main AfD list at 06:14 UTC , and then went to Kmc212's talk page to notify the primary author of the page. I then found that you had already posted a notification at 06:14 UTC. This is fine, but I would have preferred to do it myself, so that it looks like I'm on top of things, and also so that I could have used rather than  in an attempt to be a little less bitey. Just something for your consideration. —Bkell (talk) 06:27, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The bot currently runs off a cron job, so I could change how it runs or run it less often (it runs every 15 minutes). Without running a continuous process the bot has no way of knowing when the page was added to the AfD page or prod cat. BJ Talk 10:39, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

About Image:Crest skh.png
Please delete this image. I have replaced it by Image:Crest of skh2.png with better contrast. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ngckmax (talk • contribs) 08:14, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

New Images
I am currently updating the Elland Road article and I uploaded the two photos to see how they looked in the edit preview. They will be included when I finally complete it. Kaboooz LUFC TC 19:50, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Faulty PROD notification?
Hey,

This is a bit odd, because July 2005 doesn't actually seem to have ever been PROD'ed. Something wrong?

James F. (talk) 20:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I have no idea how that happened, that is definitely a bug. BJ Talk 10:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

More bot problems
Regarding your message on my talk page: I think you're talking about my redirect of "Icecream" to "Ice cream", which appears to have been later changed into an article about a software package, and subsequently renamed to the current title of to "Icecream (software)". The author of the first revision of a page is not necessary the author of the article currently at that name, for example, as in this case, if their edit was to create a redirect. Please feel free to AfD it, and please modify your bot so it doesn't make mistakes like this. -- The Anome (talk) 22:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The only way to fix that would be to remove notifying the page creator when no other editors have made a major contribution. BJ Talk 10:31, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Michaelgambino10
I dont really understand why you brought this to me, I dont use that username anymore because I forgot the password--Yankees10 01:23, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Philippe Dubois
The User Fram is not an art critic!! I am Doctor of History of Art. I hope that it is not an Ethnic Conflict (Fleming & Walloon)!!! Bel brigitte (talk) 08:31, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Blocked user
Can the bot check if the user has been blocked before notifying about a prod? It has happened here diff --JD554 (talk) 15:33, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Aleix Serra
It's a new player from the reserves team. http://www.ellleida.com/ficha_not.php?id=2258 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scaufape (talk • contribs) 18:07, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Unhappy
Don't delete User:Kitty53/Andi Whaley. Eversince you sent me that message, I began to feel like I'd lose my hard work. Then someone would have to recreate it, and I'd have to go through it being kept deleted, so then getting it recreated would take days, weeks, months, or possibly years!

For that, I hope you are a kind Wikipedian, unlike Od Mishehu, who rarely gives out barnstars (hence his unkindness), because I am in a bad mood, and it's preventing me from sleeping! Please, don't delete my subpage. I don't feel like I am good at making notable articles on Wikipedia anymore. In fact, I don't think I am, anymore.

I just wanted to save my hard work from getting lost. Any work that gets created, if deleted eventually, the creator of that article can never recreate it him or herself. And that's not fair. For example, I have lost some articles that suffered last year from deletion. I could not get it notable enough, and I lost them, I felt, permanently.

I don't want my newly created subpage to be gone. I need your kindness and you to cheer me up.:'-( (Please respond on my talk page, and be polite, because I am not in a good mood right now, and neither am I having a good night's sleep.)Kitty53 (talk) 07:16, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Would it be possible to link to the relevant article in the edit summaries? Thanks. -- Cobi(t 01:10, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done. BJ Talk 00:11, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Happy
Hi, BJBot! I'm happy again!:)Kitty53 (talk) 16:47, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

too fast?
Hi. Your bot notified the creator within a few seconds of the prod tag. Is it supposed to work so fast? -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 00:16, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * This is the second complaint on the subject and I can't think of an easy way to fix it. It runs every 15 minutes off a cronjob, so you just got (un)lucky. I could run it less often but if you prod or afd a page near the run time it still might beat you to it. BJ Talk 00:49, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Isn't every fifteen minutes too often? Prodded articles never get deleted anything close to fifteen minutes after the prod.-- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 00:54, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll drop it back to every hour. BJ Talk 00:58, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * That sounds right. (BTW, I wish I was computer savvy enough to even think about making a bot).-- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 01:07, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done BJ Talk 00:12, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

WARCRY LOGO
I uploaded the image but i didn't take it off any article. You should go and see the history. Rockk3r Talk 21:46, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

You've notified me about a picture
and I no longer care about any of my postings here. it got orphaned in the process of someone applying their version of American copyright laws to Iceland and I no longer resist. Thanks for he note. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 15:53, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Youth Offending Glossary
I've just added more text, but it isn't showing. Could someone/anypne please clarify about the proposed deletion please?--SJB (talk) 21:41, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Alfred the Great
I'm a little confused...what exactly is about to be deleted from the Alfred article? February 8, 2008. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Avram Fawcett (talk • contribs) 03:35, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

regarding dheerudu
pvsamrat (talk) 00:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)pvsamrat This name of the film which is being starred by ram charan Tej and kajal agarwal is announced by an regional T.V channel(Gemini News) that the movie name is dheerudu and will start its production work from last week of february,hence i started this article which is still under construction,updates shall be added shortly.

another nottification at its relisting?
Sorry to bother you again, but the bot "notified" me of an old discussion. I assume that the relisting touched off the bot. Any thought of modifying it to ignore relists?-- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 01:06, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Image: Plasticity
Hi buddy, The image I posted is created with SALOME under CAELinux distribution, wich is free, actually I link the image with this article SALOME, and I asked to the creator of the image Joël Cugnoni (from [www.caelinux.com|CAELinux.com] and he said the entire site is free, for verification ask him..., or send him a email info@caelinux.com. Bye!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicoguaro (talk • contribs) 16:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Facts about the element Nickel
This bot left a notification about the prod tag on the talk page of this article, which is redundant. It should have only left notification of the prod on the talk page of the article's author/sole contributor. Just FYI. --  At am a chat 22:22, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Notification of User:Conversion script
I reverted yr notification] of User:Conversion script. Wouldn't it be worthwhile bypassing your fellow bots? I mean, c'mon, would you pay any attention to that message, if you got it? [wink] --Jerzy•t 01:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

deleting our page? (miseria)
we meet all criteria under the music standards, we have published works in northern california, which are also available nationwide through myspace.com and snocap.com, the first demo we released is fully copyrighted and we own all permissions to it so there is no reason why our pages should be deleted, everything stated on them is factual and can be proven to every extent and in reading wp:music we meet the standards. so we are please asking you to remove the proposal of deletion, thank you.

Shadowguy76 (talk) 06:56, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Stella Matutina Disambiguation
Stella Matutina (disambiguation) is to be deleted.

Well, the problem is there are two "Stella Matutina", but only the first one one gets noticed. I was looking for a way that both get recognition. Maybe here is a better way?

Please help! Thanks!

--Ambrosius007 (talk) 21:11, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

It seems, the problem is solved. Please delete. --Ambrosius007 (talk) 16:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Wayobjects
The Wiktionary in turn should refer back to the Wikipedia to cover the links to this article in the following articles (see also Talk:Wayobjects): as well as Hence before deleting this article look at "what links here", but I could make it a redirect back to "W" in "Rail terminology". Peter Horn 18:55, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Right-of-way
 * Permanent way
 * Structure gauge
 * Simutrans Transport Simulator
 * Rail terminology
 * Wayside etc.
 * No definition yet either way:

Peter Horn 19:52, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

I nominated my own user subpage to be deleted.
In reference to User:Rebelyell2006/Mastifs, I nominated my own page to be deleted. I know it is the function of the bot to notify me that the page was nominated to be deleted, but still, it is somewhat pointless, and plus the time the bot used to notify me could have been used to do something else. Rebelyell2006 (talk) 02:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * For the future use db-author to have it deleted. BJ Talk 17:52, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Rebelyell2006 (talk) 07:30, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Prod tag duplicate notices
Er, you didn't add Produserpagewarning (just Produserpagewarningwelcome) to your exemption/check/whatever list, so once again, duplicate notices. Thanks. --Calton | Talk 14:18, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Fixed. BJ Talk 17:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Images for talk pages?
I presume that posting an image for discussion on talk pages is bad? I posted three images of a certain Wikipedia page in three different browsers to illustrate a template problem, but they're apparently orphaned, so saith BJBot.

Now, here's one of them: -- the Whatlinkshere mechanism covers user pages and talk pages, but the bot doesn't.

Is this a bug, or a policy? I assume BJBot's reasoning is that talk pages referencing image don't count under the assumption that the images were created for an article -- am I right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghiraddje (talk • contribs) 23:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * It is policy, the images has to be used not just liked. BJ Talk 00:07, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

"Orphaned fair use" due to page blanking
Hello. I don't know if this is a massively unlikely blip, but your bot has flagged Image:UNCLOS_logo.gif as "orphaned fair use" a couple of times in the past few days (and messaged me about it), in both cases because a vandal had blanked the only article that was using the image. The blanking had been reverted by another bot, in both cases, in less than a minute. If this happens frequently, is it worth considering a way to catch and prevent such overenthusiasm? Or would your bot have checked the article again later, if I'd left it alone? --McGeddon (talk) 16:23, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * No, no that isn't it. It is the recurring mediawiki bug that keep coming back. As of this comment the images has to file links but it is in use on the article. BJ Talk 22:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

prod warning for images.
It seems that if users prod an image, and this bot gives out a warning, the bot includes the full image on the talk page of the user. See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJohn121206&diff=193209118&oldid=192980364  Note that this user's Talk page is somewhat NSFW atm :D --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 08:38, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The bot is just using the default prod warning template. BJ Talk 02:03, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:StockyardMagazineMasthead.JPG Orphaned
You can delete the image, I had meant to do it in the first place as I am using another image in its place. Thanks for the update, although. --AmbassadorX8 (talk) 01:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Bug: Incorrect tagging
I received messages on my talk page today about Image:Bungienet20040409.jpg and Image:Bungienet20040401.png being orphaned. However, they are both in use on Bungie Studios. guiltyspark (talk) 13:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I think this is more of the mediawiki bug, the code is so simple for the tagging I don't think it can make a mistake (and orphan status is checked twice). BJ Talk 00:31, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

lizrad pics
feel free to delete thoses pic. When I put them up on the page they don't look right. Bobisbob (talk) 13:50, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

BL Cougars S.C.
I just received a message saying that BL Cougar Logo was not linked to an article. My article was deleated last week. How can I get it back up? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cougar gm (talk • contribs) 14:17, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

User page prodded
Hi BJBot. You recently left a message on my talk page saying that my user page User:DH85868993/sandbox4 had been proposed for deletion (which, incidentally, it hadn't). It may or may not be relevant, but the page was transcluding X9 at the time. Regards. DH85868993 (talk) 21:54, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * A few weird errors keep popping up with this bot, I'm going to add some extra logging for the next time. BJ Talk 00:29, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Orcafeed
I did put up the picture in the Orca article it got taken off. Apparently my rationale wasn't good enough. If you think the my rationale for including it on the Orca article is good then can you please put it back on and tell them it is? Please respond soon. Bobisbob (talk) 00:50, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Staine AfD
Imagine my surprise when I get the message that Staine was nominated for AfD. I got tired of continually replacing the G3 tag that the real author had kept removing, so I nominated it for AfD and reported the guy for repeated vandalism after he'd been blocked last week. Turns out that while TW was still processing the page to tag for AfD, it had already been deleted. TW ended up recreating the page so it could put the AfD tag on it. So I end up nominating a page I created for AfD. Sigh. DarkAudit (talk) 15:38, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Music single cover image problem
This bot labeled an image I recently uploaded as orphaned on my, but in the message it had no links to the image in question. When I looked into it I found the article is way intended for lists the image as a red link, and since then I cannot make the image link to it. I think the article and this bot are having the same problem with the image's name, specifically the 7" being used as meaning seven inch sized single.

Here is the image link:. Although it red links here too it does works on my contribs page. If this is the issue please let my know and I'll see about renaming it, or getting it deleted and uploading with another name instead.

Kresock (talk) 19:36, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Palestenian Human shield.jpg
Hello BJBot, about the image, I added the image to the article Human_rights_in_Israel, some editors kept removing the image on the claim that the image is not licensed, please check the history. In my opinion the image adds value to the subject of the article. (Imad marie (talk) 05:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC))

BJBot, please be patient about deleting the image, there is a long debate going on here and here about the use of the image that is not related to copy rights. Imad marie (talk) 17:43, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Subbanna Ekkundi
He is as good as Yashwant Chittal, Gangadhar V. Chittal and Mangesh V. Nadkarni. I donot know the reasons of deletion (please list them) and I do not know where you come from. I'm in the process of acquiring his additional collections. If you want to delete, go ahead and delete it. Thanks. --Tangi-tamma (talk) 00:52, 1 March 2008 (UTC).

arudraraju
is there still any issue about verifyablitiy with the rajus page?--Arudraraju (talk) 06:02, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media
Hello,

Up From the Ashes screenshots are not orphaned. If you look at the St. Helens (film) article, you'll see that they're being used as inline link references to a section of the "Factual Errors contained in the movie" section

I'd appreciate not tagging my images without not having first looked at the Fair Use Rationale and image caption first. Srosenow 98 (talk) 06:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The image has to be used, not just linked to meet the WP:NFCC guidelines. BJ Talk 07:07, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * How does one expect an image to be used when directly inserting it into the article isn't the best way about it? Ya don't necessarily have to directly insert an image "as a thumbnail" to consider it being "used" as opposed to being abandoned. I think it's a bit presumptous to consider it abandoned when there's an inline link to it in an article. As far as I know, and the last time this occurred, all that was necessary was some information via a Fair Use Rationale indicating that it's being used as an inline link reference, and there would be no issues. If I'm wrong, please let me know, but I think it's a bit over the line considering an image abandoned when there's obviously a link to it in some fashion. Srosenow 98 (talk) 06:55, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I didn't make the rule, I just wrote the bot enforcing it. As the policy currently stands any fair use image has to be used (not linked) in at least one article. BJ Talk 07:16, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Would you mind showing me the exact line, then? I'm seeing the "One article minimum" line, but nowhere do I see it saying it has to be used instead of inlining. Srosenow 98 (talk) 07:25, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * "Non-free content is used in at least one article." #7, it isn't very clear but in all my time here that is how it has been enforced (and the bot was approved). BJ Talk 08:29, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree it's a very vague rule, but at the same time, common sense dictates that even an inline link (rather than a thumbnail link) means that it's being used at least in some fashion (therefore, the image in question isn't "abandoned"). Sure, it may look abandoned, but being used as an inline link reference kinda says "Hey, it's not best to throw up a thumbnail link here, so I'll provide a link reference instead." And given Wikipedia's policy on external links, an external link reference may be misconstrued as linkspam if I uploaded the exact same images in question to my own webserver. Inline link references to nonfree media count just as well and are just as equal as putting up a thumbnail link, or via any other method. If I sound like I'm beating the proverbial dead horse here, I apologize, but I'm merely stating web development fact and common sense.Srosenow 98 (talk) 12:59, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Rules are rules. For it to count as not being orphaned it needs to be used, and that means an actual image. Not a link.   CWii ( Talk  16:16, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, if that's the case, I think the rules should be changed to match web development common sense instead of just being there out of Wikipedia's often nonsensical bureaucracy (which in this case doesn't make a lick of sense at all). Just because it's merely being linked to doesn't mean it's abandoned. Anyone with any website development experience should know that.Srosenow 98 (talk) 08:42, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Venkanna H. Naik
I donot know the reasons of deletion (please list them) and I do not know where you come from. It looks like you are more interested than helping to improve the articles. I'm in the process of improving it if you site the reasons. If you want to delete, go ahead and delete it. Thanks. --Tangi-tamma (talk) 00:55, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Lol! you know this is a bot right? Its not an actual human. Its merely telling you your article is up for deletion. It doesn't delete it.   CWii ( Talk  16:19, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

image orphans
you are tagging images that appear in Talk pages for example, Talk:Electricity_distribution#Electrical_Diagram refers to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Electpwrdist.pdf--Billymac00 (talk) 21:26, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Fair use images are not allowed on talk pages. BJ Talk 23:13, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Possible bug with the bot....
Hi BJ,

Your bot just made this edit to User:Boomgaylove, an indefinitely-blocked sockpuppet of User:QRC2006. It seems this simply happened because your bot followed the redirect link on the talk page and posted its message normally.

I understand that following talk page redirects can be useful in instances where a user redirects the talk page of a legitimate second account to their main account, but it seems that making posts regardless of where the redirect winds up might be problematic. Is it possible to code in a namespace check to make sure that the bot is in user talk space before making an edit? I don't know if you've implemented it in your code, but I believe the Mediawiki API should offer a way to do this. It's not a big deal, but I thought I'd ask and see. Thanks! -- jonny - m t  06:10, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Indeed a bug, thanks. BJ Talk 07:11, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Fixed. BJ Talk 04:09, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * and cleaned up all the other pages I found. BJ Talk 04:47, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Rain John Lennon.jpg
It's the Kodster. I'm not using the picture anymore, so it can be deleted without any objection from me. That's all.  Kodster  (Talk) 10:20, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

World Book Day logo
Hi there. You've left me a message about an orphaned logo. It's actually in use on the World Book and Copyright Day page. Fair use as it is illustrating the text. Is there another problem with it? --Plad2 (talk) 18:09, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:SealofMumbai.jpg
This image, which is logo, has this text mentioned in its license rule on WP.
 * This logo belongs to the MCGM. However, this may be used for informative purposes related to the relevant article in Wikipedia under the fair use clause.

This image is now added to Mumbai page & I guess this is fair use since it is purely used for informative purpose. This image was recently deleted from Talk:Mumbai page, which is fine since it not needed there, but should not be classified for deletion from main page of Mumbai. gp pande «talk» 10:02, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Bot malfunction?
I think the BJBot likes to be mean to me! It constantly says that I vandalize the Homeless Discrimination page...can some one fix the issue please? Thanks-Letter 7/Caleb (talk) 15:54, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Mitchell Hanson: Deletion
I have no issue with the deletion of the Mitchell Hanson article I started, I was just creating/improving articles for the current Derby County squad. I agree for the reasons regarding him not being notable enough. Cheers. AnOrdinaryBoy (talk) 10:09, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Suggested tweak to coding
Re (this), I suggest the Bot's told it doesn't need to notify people who placed the prod notice that a prod notice has been placed! :-) --Dweller (talk) 12:12, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * It should already ignore the placer, I'll test the code that does the checking more. BJ Talk 12:14, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Groovy. --Dweller (talk) 12:30, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Turns out the code was fine, I just broke it in a change I made yesterday. Fixed, thanks. BJ Talk 15:19, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Images for Mushkin article
- Image:Mushkin_PerformanceLogo.jpg

- Image:Mushkin_ValueLogo.jpg

- Image:Mushkin_logo.jpg

Please note that the images are no longer orphaned as the article is amended and put back in place. Kindly restore. Thanks! Seksek (talk) 07:10, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Proposed Deletions of gay porn stars entries
I don't know if this is the proper way to proceed, but since I was sent two messages referring to two different articles (Dominik Trojan and Johan Volny) marked for deletion, I thought I should make a couple of comments. A lot of purging has been going on recently, and it just confirms what I've been thinking for some time, that Wikipedia has no room for gay porn. Most remarkable is the insistence in applying rules and procedures that, in their very expression, only refer to straight porn. To put it simply, the respective weights and public surfaces of straight porn and gay porn ensure that it is much more difficult to dig up published and reliable sources, and this is even more the case when it comes to the European side. So this is scholarship in the making, and it seems particularly regrettable to stifle within the straitjacket of principles, that allow no concern for the specifics of a film genre and its cultural meaning for the gay community and beyond. The way filmographies have been mutilated without any concern for which films should be kept, as the editor had of course no knowledge whatsoever of those films is to me typical. I am an academic by training and I now work in publishing and I think such bureaucratic procedures are not compatible with the advancement of knowledge. A final remark: of the two entries I was sent a warning about, one is now "safe", since the model in question had in fact received an award. But this particular award has no real value as the awards were entirely set up and paid for by the very studio the model is under exclusive contract with. So this is advertising and publicity, and Wikipedia will go along and give its blessing to a publicity stunt by a studio which is, at the very least controversial, with its trademark relentless push for "bareback", i.e. risky sexual intercourse in a context ripe with HIV and AIDS. Hierosme (talk) 12:46, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut
Thanks for your note about images. The logo image that appeared in the article about the foundation (the article was deleted yesterday), and all the other images I tried to upload (I'm new at this!) are owned/licensed by the foundation and I was using them with their permission. Let me know if I should have done anything differently. The logo image that had been in the article may be used in a future Wikipedia article on the foundation. Do I need to do anything about it now? The other images were my early, failed attempts to get the logo right. I could not figure out how to remove them from the Wikipedia system. Can you tell me how - or offer any other advice on this topic?

Thanks!

Danielroberts (talk) 12:50, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment
Thank you for sending me the info about the delition proposal concerning List of Diversity Organizations in Utah. I have put the following comment on the discussion section of the article: And more. I think that it would be fair to propose for delition also the similar ones." Adrian Comollo (talk) 15:26, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * "I think that there are already similar lists in wikipedia:
 * List of disability organisations in Singapore
 * List of ethnic interest groups in Canada
 * List of youth organisations in Singapore

Image:Techcrunch-transparent-photshop.gif
Hello. Concerning this diff, and this diff.

The image's author uploaded the image. The author authorized its use for this discussion:
 * Wikipedia talk:Preparing images for upload

This fair-use image is not for use in an article, but it is relevant to the above discussion. The above discussion links to the image. So the image needs to be retained. It is not an orphaned image.

I have linked to the image from the discussion. Previously, it was inlined in the discussion. Linking avoids fair-use bot problems. --Timeshifter (talk) 13:28, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Fair use images must be used in one article. BJ Talk 17:18, 16 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I read that there are exceptions.


 * The image helps illustrates a bug:
 * https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13252


 * User:Yegg13, the reporter of the bug, is also the creator of the image. See User talk:Yegg13 also. The bug has already been commented on. So I don't think it would be a good idea to delete the image. It is necessary for improving Wikipedia. This is a common-sense exception.--Timeshifter (talk) 18:00, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm baffled
Would you please tell me what exactly this bot meant to tell me a moment ago? As far as I can see that message was the most useless message I ever recieved. --Camaeron (talk) 18:06, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Are you human?
I am a bit confused... you (this bot) marked my article with - I came here to ask the reason for this, because I would like a hint on how to improve the article. i.e. what was the editors reason for marking the article as ? Now I find that the editor is a bot... I am confused... is the function of this bot to just mark pages for deletion? Am I talking to anyone now? Sorry for being dumb - it just seems like wp gets more and more complex every day! --Dan|(talk) 11:20, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

F90.jpg
F90.jpg is now linked to an article. So can you remove that deletion tag ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Roaring Siren (talk • contribs) 07:34, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done. BJ Talk 19:40, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphan messages on article talk pages
Your bot recently edited my talk page to show me that Image:Devdas.jpg was now orphaned. This, usefully, allowed me to solve the problem of a user mistake removing the image. However, lots of editors who upload images then leave Wikipedia and so the images just get deleted because no one notices. I was wondering if you could also make your bot post a message to the article talk page. This might not always be possible since it is no longer used on a page but at least with images like Image:Devdas.jpg there is a section called "air use for Devdas (2002 film)" and the images using the fair use template specifically say for use for which articles. Could you make your bot post on the article talk so that more users can fix the problem when it actually is a mistake by an anonymous editor, etc. gren グレン 17:54, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Glenn Strange \ Lon Chaney Jr.
I have made correct specifications that were needed for one photograph. I am currently working on the next one. The purpose is for information to the article. Thanks! Electric Japan (talk) 13:15, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Glenn Strange Picture
Could you add some advice on how to get it up right on the profile. I thought I added relevant information. Thanks! Electric Japan (talk) 14:18, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions
OK.I am going to stick to this information. I just wanted to add some relevant information on Wikipedia. That was it. Very simple.

Thank you. Electric Japan (talk) 14:44, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up
On the possible deletion of my biostub on Miguelito el Heredero. I've added several sources. Should I now remove the deletion template or will that be done by others?Pr4ever (talk) 13:34, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned media error
Image:Dawsonscreekalbumcover1.jpg is used in the article Dawson's Creek as noted by Karlhahn, there appears to be a problem at current with your bot's image links checking. --Matthew K (talk) 04:28, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
 * As per above, this is a Mediawiki problem, if "File links" doesn't show it used it will get tagged. BJ Talk 05:03, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:TW logo.png
The TW logo was accidentally orphaned: it is now unorphaned. Neil Leslie (talk) 02:58, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Orphaned non-free media (Image:MadisonCtTownSeal.jpg)
This image is used in Madison, Connecticut. There is apparently some tech failure in the WP mechanism that reports on the image-page what links to it. Karl Hahn (T) (C) 14:27, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The bot has flagged this one again. I have again added a note just below the orphan-tag indicating what page links to this image. Karl Hahn (T) (C) 17:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
 * It shows up as used now, so it won't be tagged again. BJ Talk 02:04, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Whitelist me.
Hi, as I upload all my stuff to commons, anything I upload on enwiki is on behalf of other people. You (your bot) may feel free to tag these images for deletion *without* notifying me. In other words, I'm not interested in the messages. Thank you. Bastique repondez 16:28, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done BJ Talk 15:42, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

userpage
Can you please add the link to Bots/Requests_for_approval/BJBot_4 on your userpage. A simple explanation of the tasks would be good also. -- maelgwn - talk 09:34, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * It was on there but I removed it as I planned to switch the task 4 to the NotifyBot account. BJ Talk 15:41, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Derek Roddy, deletion?
As you can see, i've expanded the article about Derek Roddy a bit (it's still not as elaborate as preferrable) and i don't get why it should still be deleted. If you follow the links on the page, you can see he has contributed to quite a lot of albums (even more, but the rest i couldn't find yesterday) and is a well-known drummer. Joost de Kleine (talk) 11:10, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

=Beneath the Planet of the Apes/James Franciscus= Hello. I changed the template for James Franciscus Can you check it out. Thank you. Electric Japan (talk) 12:53, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:2004-06-27 Reverse THAMMASAT UNIVERSITY 70th yea.jpg)
I screwed up & would've deleted it myself, if I know how. Pawyilee (talk) 18:35, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:AmericanCousinsDVDCover.JPG)
I received a message saying this image was going to be deleted as it was orphaned non-free media. It is in fact on the American Cousins (2003 feature film) page. Phersu (talk) 17:47, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * No, Image:AmericanCousinsPoster.JPG is. BJ Talk 04:57, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:2004-06-27 Obverse THAMMASAT UNIVERSITY 70th yea.jpg)
I thought to put this at Thai baht, but that won't work as Thailand has entirely too many commemorative coins. And a separate article on Thai commemoratives would be a perpetual work in progress. I've pasted it to Thammasat University for now, but that's problematic, too--the obverse and reverse should be paired on a black background to conform to Wikipedia standards for coin images. I may just need to start over. Meanwhile, since the reverse shows the university's seal, I'm planning on adding to TU's article links to both Democracy Monument and Dharmacakra to explain what it means. It would be nice to show the coin, too, and likewise post other commemoratives to articles to which they would relate. Sometime. Pawyilee (talk) 18:35, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Both of the above are indeed orphaned. I combined them into one paired image (Image:10-baht THAMMASAT UNIVERSITY 70th yr 2004-06-27.jpg)(still with a white background) and put that at Thammasat University under Seal. Pawyilee (talk) 15:48, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

OK
Thank you fot the relevant info. I appreciate it. Electric Japan (talk) 13:14, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:AmericanCousinsDVDCover.JPG)
I received a message saying this image was going to be deleted as it was orphaned non-free media. It is in fact on the American Cousins (2003 feature film) page. Phersu (talk) 17:47, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * No, Image:AmericanCousinsPoster.JPG is. BJ Talk 04:57, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:2004-06-27 Obverse THAMMASAT UNIVERSITY 70th yea.jpg)
I thought to put this at Thai baht, but that won't work as Thailand has entirely too many commemorative coins. And a separate article on Thai commemoratives would be a perpetual work in progress. I've pasted it to Thammasat University for now, but that's problematic, too--the obverse and reverse should be paired on a black background to conform to Wikipedia standards for coin images. I may just need to start over. Meanwhile, since the reverse shows the university's seal, I'm planning on adding to TU's article links to both Democracy Monument and Dharmacakra to explain what it means. It would be nice to show the coin, too, and likewise post other commemoratives to articles to which they would relate. Sometime. Pawyilee (talk) 18:35, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Both of the above are indeed orphaned. I combined them into one paired image (Image:10-baht THAMMASAT UNIVERSITY 70th yr 2004-06-27.jpg)(still with a white background) and put that at Thammasat University under Seal. Pawyilee (talk) 15:48, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

OK
Thank you fot the relevant info. I appreciate it. Electric Japan (talk) 13:14, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Just Wondering
How do you become an administrator on wikipedia, or is there only one? Because since you are an admin and i saw your page and it showed a red button that you are refering to non admin's and admin's.
 * I'm not an admin. :) But to become one you file a request at WP:RFA and the community has a discussion if you would be a good admin. BJ Talk 12:51, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

AFD
Another editor was quite confused by this bot recently - see Talk:Back garden. I didn't quite understand but now I've had an AFD warning from this bot too. This may be helpful but it would be even better if the user page for the bot explained more clearly what was going on. And is this use of the bot authorised? Colonel Warden (talk) 20:43, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

About my picture.
I do not know how to delete my own picture, but since you said you have done it, i want to thank you for doing it for me. I am not really interested in communism much anymore, since i got rid of the two boxes that were affilated with communism on my user page, though i am still connected to communism on some aspects, such as peace and equality.

Feel free to comment on my user page at anytime.

Thanks.

71.116.23.185 (talk) 00:53, 7 April 2008 (UTC)