User talk:BLOCKER78


 * Support Editors "edit" published works while "authors" write them and "readers" obviously read them. The first two work to produce an attractive, engaging and hopefully successful published written work for the third. Tons of editors spend most of their time deleting well-written contributions and/or "authoring" ridiculous amounts of written text not produced for anyone's benefit but their own and not "public" to the casual Wikipedia "reader". And usually while claiming to be "building an encyclopedia". And the hyper-speed at which many of them seem to manage to "read" and arbitrarily delete content vs. the amount of time they spend "authoring" what has to run into the millions of words per year at least in "discussions" arguing against any and all "policy" changes or any other change to Wikipedia that makes it a more "user-friendly" and inviting and attractive published work suggests they're not nearly so interested in being "editors who also read" as they are interested in being published "authors" of their own opinions, observations, interpretations of "policy", original research and ultimately their own "thesis" on anything and everything they consider their "contributions" important to even when they do nothing whatsoever to improve or add to the actual content Wikipedia is providing to "users". Users who spend an inversely proportional amount of their time READING Wikipedia instead of "editing" it.