User talk:BLV217

Hello, I'm Blv217 This Page will be open soon BLV217 (talk) 22:42, 3 May 2008 (UTC)BLV217BLV217 (talk) 22:42, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.

The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bmyspace\.com' (link(s): http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=13227620/Offical). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 15:40, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:6664-R1-23-21.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:6664-R1-23-21.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 16:48, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:6664-R1-23-21.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:6664-R1-23-21.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:16, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Manada Creek
Hello BLV; i have just made a couple of edits to the article you created on Manada Creek. You might like to take a look, see how i felt it could be improved. There is one thing i need your help with: I changed the point at which you said the watershed is 1.8 miles. Two things: If you meant watershed, as i assume you did, since it is the American usage, that requires an area measurement ~ i changed it to two miles square, but that seems to be a small watershed; if, on the other hand, you meant watershed, which is the British (most of the rest of the world, i think) usage, it needs to be changed back, and again seems to be very small. Can you please take a look and see what i mean, and make sure i have done right? Cheers, Lindsay 15:47, 7 June 2008 (UTC)