User talk:BLeverich

Welcome!
Hello, BLeverich, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:35, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Response
Hi! I'm not entirely sure what you mean as far as editing your sandbox goes - do you mean starting an article or copying one to your sandbox? Let me know on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 22:19, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived
The editor's sources, using Ulrich Web Global Series Dictionary, are reliable and appropriate considering the topic of the article. The writer maintains a neutral stance of the topic and is neither for or against the Korean Wave, solely providing information about the topic. The structure of the article is flows thoroughly but not exactly balanced. The structure is good in the aspect as it transitions properly, but the final article seems to have a large focus on each individual country that the Korean wave has affected. The editor should leave out some of the countries that have been minimally affected. The Lead of the article is nicely crafted. The lead talks about specific points that the article aims to hit and formerly introduces the topic as a whole.

Michelleg010 (talk) 17:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Michelle George

Peer Reviewed by TLhakyi
The Lead: The editor did a great job editing the lead becasue she was able to find a detail that is not neccesarily true, showing extensive research.

Structure: The edit done by BLeverich in proposing the addition of a new section on the K-Con was a good idea since it shpows the spread of the korean culture on the western world.

Balanced according to all the available literature: Bleverich also added the KCon official website as a link which I am questioning if it is a promotional piece, however it is a good source of the popularity of Korean pop culture.

Neutral content: Her addition of the KCon promotional piece seemed to be a bit opinionated even though she cited it from the site, she didn’t establish the neutrality of it.

Reliable sources: The promotional piece from Kcon’s website was not a relaible source, however it is a good link to add context to the piece. --Tlhakyi (talk) 19:34, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Peer Reviewed By ZacharSoto96
The editor made nice additions to the article such as the introduction of KCON. This addition has reliable information and reliable sources. The content is very neutral and balanced. Bleverich cleared up the lead introduction sentence in reference to Hallyu but I believe some information can be added to correlate the lead to the sections below. I also mentioned in my peer review, that more information can be added to the influence of the Korean Wave to countries like Iraq, U.S, and U.K since it is very little detailed.

https://www-sciencedirect-com.libproxy.albany.edu/science/article/pii/S0147176713000825

Above I attached a link to source that I found on the Ualbany Search engine if you want to take a look if it provides helpful information to add to your article. Zacharysoto96 (talk) 20:48, 21 November 2019 (UTC)