User talk:BMCBTDBSM

December 2015
Hello, I'm Eman235. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to USS Bellatrix (AF-62) has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Eman 235 / talk 01:06, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at USS Bellatrix (AF-62). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Qzd (talk) 03:13, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at English Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: English Wikipedia was changed by BMCBTDBSM (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.914991 on 2015-12-17T03:18:25+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:18, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at USS Bellatrix (AKA-3). Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: USS Bellatrix (AKA-3) was changed by BMCBTDBSM (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.898047 on 2015-12-17T03:21:14+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:21, 17 December 2015 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 03:56, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Unblocking
Hey, I didn't edit bad things in wikipedia after you warn me 4 times. I just only edit Bloons TD's wiki and the info was true, if you don' believe me go check the game out. I am innocent for the 5th warning and being blocked, I protest because of this innocent act. I think the admins: Eman235, Qzd, and ClueBot NG are 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times  better than you admin, because they warn me on the  right thing. You, the trolling admin dare to do this thing to me for writing true info. You better be care fu, because I can report you MaterialScientist.
 * Sorry, but that is the rules in Wikipedia. Their policies are much different to Bloons Wiki or Bloon TD Wiki, such as the need for well-sourced content and out-of-universe perspective. MaterialScientist blocked you because you have not been learning from your warnings. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 22:40, 17 December 2015 (UTC)