User talk:BOOGERBOYOFOHIO

May 2019
Hello, I'm Gonzo fan2007. An edit that you recently made to Charles Woodson seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! « Gonzo fan2007  (talk)  @ 16:17, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Charles Woodson, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  16:38, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at N'Keal Harry, you may be blocked from editing. « Gonzo fan2007  (talk)  @ 16:41, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Eli Manning.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  22:23, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

January 2020
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  17:20, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Your addition to Tom Brady has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  16:09, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tom Brady‎, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Tarl N. ( discuss ) 18:34, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pug. CLCStudent (talk) 02:20, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. 331dot (talk) 02:41, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

The request must be copied when viewing this page and then placed outside the block notice once you open the edit window, not simply overwriting it. I've fixed it so it will be properly seen; someone else will review it. 331dot (talk) 16:22, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Could you please clarify the second sentence in your decline reason? I'm not sure I follow.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  16:34, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * It would be acceptable for this user to violate WP:3RR (as they clearly did) if they were reverting vandalism. It certainly doesn't appear that way to me, but it'd be a justification for their editing. --Yamla (talk) 16:35, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  19:44, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I undid your edit, because you left it inside the block notification. That won't trigger an unblock review, and you aren't allowed to change that text in the first place. You need to copy the text to a new line outside the block notification. And it needs to start with " {{unblock... ", not " {{tlx|unblock... }}". All that said, your unblock review is unlikely to work, since you clearly do not understand why you were blocked. On Wikipedia, the absolute requirement is verifiability. Read WP:V. No matter how sure you are that your answer is RIGHT, you are not allowed to add it unless it is verifiable - that is, a reliable source (read WP:RS) has published that fact you are asserting. You could be wrong, and we have no reason to believe you. And lastly, worrying about an inch of height is dumb; people's height will change as the day goes by. Tallest when you wake up, shorter after a day pounding your spine down with exercise. Regards, Tarl N. ( discuss ) 03:45, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed | 1='Ok. Sorry, I hope I did this right. I'm sorry for making persistent disruptive edits, I have OCD and I'm a perfectionist, so when I saw dwayne haskins height saying 6'4" when I thought it was 6'3" I changed it. I added a source, which was the combine, but, it really doesn't matter, it's just an inch. So, I'm sorry, I don't mean to cause any trouble, I just want to get back to making useful edits on wikipedia. I don't want to obsess on this kind of thing anymore. I'm very sorry. Please unblock me. | decline = Cu-confirmed block evasion, as mentioned below. ST47 (talk) 19:27, 16 February 2020 (UTC)}}

You still left the request within the block notice; you should copy the template when viewing this page, then open the edit window, paste it, and fill in the information. I have fixed this for you. 331dot (talk) 19:14, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Also a note for the reviewing admin, this user used a sockpuppet while this block was active here.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  19:21, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed | 1=Please listen. I'm sorry for making disruptive edits. PLEASE give me another chance, I promise it will never happen again, I love adding content to wikipedia that is hopefully helpful. I do have 2 wiki accounts, I made they other one because my username is stupid. I don't mean to block evade. I'm asking for a second chance. PLEASE. Please unblock me. It will never happen again. BOOGERBOYOFOHIO (talk) 04:20, 17 February 2020 (UTC) | decline = You obviously deliberately attempted to evade this block. Nick-D (talk) 07:42, 17 February 2020 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed|reason=Am I never going to be able to be unblocked? I'm sorry for disruptive editing. I just want another chance. I'm sorry, I never meant to cause any trouble, I really was only trying to make useful edits, but, I got blocked for it. Please give me another chance.BOOGERBOYOFOHIO (talk) 19:33, 18 February 2020 (UTC)|decline=See below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:36, 18 February 2020 (UTC)}}

You have no realistic possibility of unblocking while you continue to violate Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, such as you were doing last week with {{np|AlexanderStenger}}. Your most likely path to being unblocked is to go six months with zero edits (and no further violations of WP:EVADE and WP:SOCK), then apply under WP:SO. You'll need to explain why we should trust you, given you've worked hard to clearly demonstrate you can't be trusted, multiple times. Note also, you are not permitted to blank declined unblock requests for your currently active block. Do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 19:37, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed|reason=I just want a second chance. Go ahead and leave the block if you want, but, I've said that I'm sorry and I mean it. I wish I could just get another chance, because, even if I did do something else, you could just block me again. But, that would not happen. I'm sorry, I want so bad to just have another chance. Listen, I understand why I was blocked, and it will never happen again, I know it was wrong and I get that. I just want one chance.BOOGERBOYOFOHIO (talk) 19:44, 18 February 2020 (UTC)|decline=You can ask for the standard offer in six months. This requires you to stop editing English Wikipedia for six months, which obviously includes not using any sock puppets or logged-out IPs. If you can follow that one simple rule, we'll reconsider your block. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:36, 18 February 2020 (UTC)}}