User talk:BRDSKoff44

Talkback
I need some help on Gail Koff's page. i do not think that her contentious divorce should be quoted in a wikipedia article. my view is that wiki should not have scandulous material no matter whether it is covered in a news paper or not. Not all news paper article are correct and even if they have correct information about a divorce, details about prenubtual agreements should not be included - that is scandous. i have tried to remove these several times and have now gotten into a discussion with two individuals - i have more important things to do then this - i am a Professor and need to go back to work. After this experience i plan to NEVER accept a reference to this Wikipedia - unless an administrator corrects this issueBRDSKoff44 (talk) 16:16, 22 September 2010 (UTC).
 * I've done much of the editing on the Gail Koff article. I understand your concerns about some of the content of the article, but the material that is at issue is backed by reliable and verifiable sources. The best way to address your issue is to work on a consensus to modify the content of the article, rather than to unilaterally bowdlerize the article. Please understand that my purpose in putting the material in the article in the first place was to provide a full picture of Gail Koff based on the available sources and I hope that I did an adequate job in reflecting the available material, including material you added to the article. Alansohn (talk) 20:23, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Welcome and introduction
Hi, BRDSKoff44. This is NOT some automated message...it's from a real person. You can talk to me right now. Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you've just joined, and wanted to give you a few tips to get you started. If you have any questions, please talk to us. The tips below should help you to get started. Best of luck! Shearonink (talk) 16:04, 22 September 2010 (UTC)