User talk:BRH266

Welcome!
Hello, BRH266, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:05, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fuel crisis. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:53, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Fuel crisis
Please note that disambiguation pages like : are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:


 * Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
 * Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
 * Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
 * Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
 * Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
 * Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

You may prefer to edit an article such as 2022 global energy crisis. Leschnei (talk) 18:12, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Your draft
Hi. I removed your additions to the energy crisis article because they aren't ready for mainspace. Remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, and you need an appropriately formal tone for your writing. For example


 * "Through the ruff" isn't appropriate language for Wikipedia
 * "There are many causes for this" is too vague to be helpful
 * You didn't include any references


 * "Several months...no end in sight" is too vague.
 * "Just like any war Ukraine is using a lot of resources" - this is too informal and vague.
 * "This dose [sic] not just effect Ukraine" - it's important that you copyedit your work before moving it to mainspace.
 * "The war that Ukraine is in is a war with Russia" - You should link to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine the first time to mention the war. By using formal language and a link, there's no need to explain thing. (Also the language here is much too casual and informal)
 * You should only use quotations when the information in the source you're citing can't be paraphrased without a significant loss of meaning. That's not the case with the quotes you're using here.


 * "Now you may be thinking ok they don't have gas how bad can it be." A Wikipedia article is only supposed to report on what reliable sources say about the article. You aren't supposed to add your own commentary like this, and you shouldn't be trying to convince your readers. Generally speaking, if you're using the first or second person in a Wikipedia article, you're getting the tone wrong.

Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:25, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 * You're never talking directly to your readers.
 * Copyediting is important - "let's" and "it's" not "lets" and "its".