User talk:BRoxyRogers

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello, BRoxyRogers, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klee Irwin seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 01:31, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

That discussion was 12 years ago. The article was deleted after this discussion, in 2014. It's over. If you want to recreate the article, you can try that. Dumping 22k into an ancient discussion is not helpful, and adding comments like "As a journalist, research, business owner, and former donor to Wikimedia Foundation, I have had enough of Wikipedia's complete disregard for monitoring Wikimedia.org." is certainly not helpful, and neither are comments like this, "I have no idea why, but someone has personally targeted this scientist and has made it their life's work to denigrate his, and to produce false testimony against his work, his two companies, and across two industries." There is no conspiracy; there was a lack of secondary sources. Drmies (talk) 01:36, 15 July 2022 (UTC)


 * 1,230 words +/- in responding to each area or to each editor that weighed in on the subject is not 22K.
 * Yes, it may have been 12 years ago, but in that case the properly submitted bio that was deleted should have been restored by now.~ BRoxyRogers (talk) 01:43, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * "Should have been restored" doesn't exist. "Could have been written again" is a possibility. Drmies (talk) 01:45, 15 July 2022 (UTC)