User talk:BSW-RMH

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, BSW-RMH! I am Madhero88 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing helpme at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! M aen K. A. Talk 23:01, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

--- Dear Madhero88, Thanks so much for the welcome and helpful info! I hope I can be of help to the project. BSW-RMH (talk) 23:34, 9 May 2010 (UTC)BSW-RMH

Q
No worries it takes a little time to figure out how Wikipedia works. You can use the same ref in multiple places like this: "point A point B" If you look at an article like strep throat you will see this syntax used. Cheers Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 03:16, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you! BSW-RMH (talk) 14:23, 13 May 2010 (UTC)


 * I have added your comment to the main google project page. Feel free to move it if you want. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 15:54, 13 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Correction. It is fine to have it on both pages. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 23:05, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia! Axl ¤  [Talk]  00:05, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
I have already said it in the HD talk; but from what I have seen I feel that your reviews are probably being the best ones in the google collaboration: I feel that you have grasped the collaborative spirit of wikipedia since you are interacting with editors and projects instead of simply throwing your reviews in talk pages. Thanks a lot for your great work. For sure it will bring great improvements to many articles which will go further than your specific proposed changes: You may have already noticed that high quality reviewing (and editing) brings high quality editing and therefore you are creating a great group momentum.Bests.--Garrondo (talk) 06:50, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Double thanks, based on the HD review, you have a polite and complimentary manner and good reviewing style. Pleased to see you've gotten a barnstar already! Lee&there4;V (talk • contribs) 12:43, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much! I am so glad the reviews are helpful!! I feel very honored to be a part of the project and have enjoyed working with you all. BSW-RMH (talk) 16:11, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

2009 flu pandemic
--Cyber cobra (talk) 22:16, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Heartburn
Heartburn is a symptoms not a disease. It is thus not commonly confused with chest pain but can indicated an MI/ACS just as chest pain can indicate an MI/ACS. The disease that heartburn usually indicates is gastritis or GERD and that is were the discussion of these symptoms belong. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:26, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

A quick note
Hey RMH it is always a good idea to have the text you are added copied to the clipboard before hitting save. This prevents whatever you have just written from being lost :-) Cheers. -- Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:37, 18 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Anyway let me know when you are wishing to discuss this issue further. I by the way see people on a regular basis who have delayed their presentation to the emergency department with an MI because they though it was GERD due to the symptom of heartburn.  This is well documented in the literature that this is a prevalent misconception to equate heartburn with GERD.  Just because the Mayo Clinic repeats this misinformation does not mean that we hear at Wikipedia wish to do the same. The gastroenterologist get the diseases of GERD and gastritis but it is we the emerg docs who specialize in the management of symptoms and signs such as heart burn and chest pain. :-)  Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 17:46, 18 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi there, I've started copying to the clip board now :) I also try to hit preview often as this saves changes in a recoverable way too. OK, so I revised the edit to try to explain how I am approaching this. I am going to just use common terms here-to reflect the audience we are writing for. I appreciate fully your perspective and I've thought about this in detail. For me it comes down to writing for the Wikipedia audience. My recommendation for the definition is not to define heartburn as symptom but to define it as a condition/disease. The symptom you are calling heartburn I proposed to call a burning sensation in the chest. Here's my reasoning: that is the way the general public would most commonly define those two situations (as well as gastroenterologists). I do recognize that some lay people, and emergency docs as you mentioned, also use 'heartburn' to refer to any burning sensation in the chest AND that these different causes of burning sensations in the chest can be easily confused by patients if the pain is not severe, which should be noted in the definition section, but I don't think that is the most common definition. I think this makes the most sense, and is the most in line with the purpose of Wikipedia. I'll leave the recommendation on the talk page though so editors can hash it out and reach consensus on whether to define it as a 'symptom' or aconditon/disease'. BSW-RMH (talk) 18:43, 18 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia has a policy to deal with naming issues for medical articles Manual of Style (medicine-related articles) which stipulates that we us technical terms in a technical sense. Gastroenterologist BTW do not usually use the term "heartburn" to describe a disease but the more specific terms GERD, functional heartburn, etc. I agree that the lay press does use heartburn to indicate GERD but we cannot us it in this sense as 1) we already have a page on this topic so this would be a cotract 2) it would become to complicated we a mix of technical and nontechnical terms. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 19:21, 18 May 2010 (UTC)


 * I also agree that scientific intitutions such as the mayo clinic when writing for the lay public use heartburn as a synonym for GERD. I think this is poor practice but it is what it is. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 19:23, 18 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Let me be clear: I am not using GERD as synonymous with gastric reflux. GI clinicians commonly use heartburn to refer to the pain caused by gastric reflux, not just GERD. GERD is a very specific disease/condition/disorder and rightly should have it's own article. BSW-RMH (talk) 20:10, 18 May 2010 (UTC)


 * I am finished with the review-so I am going to move this discussion over to the heartburn talk page if that's OK with you. BSW-RMH (talk) 20:12, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

(undent) Sure and I have asked other to provide their opinions. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:41, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Great! That would be incredibly helpful for reaching a consensus on the article-if it is supposed to be about a symptom only, then the review will need to be redone. BSW-RMH (talk) 21:43, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Will leave it for a few days. Often takes some time for people to comment. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 16:00, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Chagas disease
Chagas disease has been marked as completed on the list of articles. As with all things wiki, if you disagree, you just need to let us know. WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:27, 19 May 2010 (UTC)


 * OK. Thanks for letting me know :) BSW-RMH (talk) 15:17, 19 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I guess I'm a bit late (sometimes I work in my own little bubble). But I have indeed implemented all of the changes that you suggested for the Chagas article. Thank you for making it so easy for me... The suggestions that you gave for actual text that I could incorporate into the article were very helpful. If you wouldn't mind taking a look to confirm that all of your suggestions were appropriately addressed, I think we can call this one closed. Again, thank you for your simple, easy to follow, and comprehensive review! Cheers--DO11.10 (talk) 17:19, 19 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Well done! I just checked it over and I think this article is superlative. Maybe WP:MED can add a class called 'Gold Standard Articles', with the Chagas article as the first member. BSW-RMH (talk) 14:54, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Huntington's disease
I believe that we have followed most of your advices. We still have some doubts with naming conventions for genes, and up to this moment your advice has been very useful in this aspect. Whenever you have time some more input would be most praised. Bests.--Garrondo (talk) 08:28, 19 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Great! You are fast! I should have time later today or tomorrow to weigh back in. BSW-RMH (talk) 15:16, 19 May 2010 (UTC)


 * I checked it out and added a few comments that I hope will help with the remaining issues. It looks great! I can see why this one is featured :) BSW-RMH (talk) 17:06, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I have just read your answer on the penetrance issue and seems great. Since it is long and changes would have to be subtle I'll re-read them carefully over the weekend and try to work over them. Thanks a lot for all your effort.--Garrondo (talk) 19:38, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Glad it helped and you are very welcome :) BSW-RMH (talk) 20:57, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Been rushing around getting ready - (and in the right location) for a good friend's wedding this weekend ... should be back in action shortly after to rejoin in the fun and clear up any remaining points ( if you leave me any - Garrondo! ) Cheers! Lee&there4;V (talk • contribs) 00:31, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Sexual intercourse article
Just letting you know that I replied to all of your concerns and suggestions, and have started to make changes to the article. Flyer22 (talk) 21:46, 21 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Great! It looks like at least one of the suggestions will be useful :) Good luck with your writing and improvements. BSW-RMH (talk) 01:56, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up. I am all for you helping out. Flyer22 (talk) 19:05, 26 May 2010 (UTC)


 * I've updated all the ref and stats from the intro to the legal/ethical/religion section. I'd like to replace this next section with the outline I suggested in the review to address the Refimprove tag. This can be expanded over time, but will allow the article to be translated in the mean time. What are your thoughts on doing this? BSW-RMH (talk) 15:40, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Replied on the talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 17:00, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * But as I stated there, "Awesome, awesome work, BSW-RMH. It feels really good to have significant help with this article. I have often put off fixing certain areas, due to being busy, lost of interest in editing Wikipedia, or just plain laziness. So I thank you a lot, especially for your expertise. Yes, I am all for you redesigning the Ethical, moral, and legal issues section." Flyer22 (talk) 17:01, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

There is a recent discussion on the talk page relating to an addition you made. See here: Talk:Sexual intercourse. Flyer22 (talk) 16:58, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Dermatology
Any interest in dermatology? If so, we are always looking for more help at the Dermatology task force, particularly with the ongoing Bolognia push. I can e-mail you the login information if you like? There is still a lot of potential for many new articles and redirects. Just let me know. ---kilbad (talk) 17:55, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Constipation
Thank you for improving constipation. Could I persuade you to apply citation templates when adding references? These will automatically parse some of the content into hyperlinks, e.g. the DOI. JFW | T@lk  06:12, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I am not following that page, but I only wanted to mention that if you are adding articles cited in pubmed you can use this tool: you add the pmid number and you have your citation ready to paste in the article.--Garrondo (talk) 07:32, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll give it another try. I was having problems using that tool for some reason. I was hoping a bot would come aorund and fix my manual citations :) BSW-RMH (talk) 00:51, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * That tool is working great! I'm using it for direct edits now. Thanks! BSW-RMH (talk) 01:35, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Question and request
Hello! I left a question at Talk:Sexual intercourse which I think is for you (I didn't review the whole article history, just the talk page.)

I also have a request: In the Nutrition article, someone went through and added [citation needed] tags to essentially all of the unsourced claims, but then someone else googled most if not all of those and found supporting sources that they recorded at Talk:Nutrition. Could you please look through those and merge in the ones which you think are good sources? I've been looking to do this for a while, but I don't have the biology expertise which I think you do.

Thanks for all the work you've been doing. Selery (talk) 00:10, 22 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi Selery, I am actually contracted by Google to do the 'external edits' and I have a pretty big backlog at the moment. When I am finished with those, I will check through the nutrition sources on my own time. I'll drop you a line when I get a chance to look it over. BSW-RMH (talk) 00:54, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Depression (mood)
Hi. I think all your suggestions here are sensible. I work very slowly, and am picking at the article here and there, but if you want to dive in and execute massive changes, be my guest. I support every one of your proposals. Anthony (talk) 12:36, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know you are working on it and I'm really glad you support the suggestions! I'll probably only implement changes that don't require a consensus, such as adding citations or additional referenced material. I'll just have to see how the time goes. BSW-RMH (talk) 02:54, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Asthma
Thank you for your further review (a month ago). Unfortunately I'm rather busier now and I have less time to work on the article. However we (WikiProject Medicine) appreciate your review and we'll continue to work on it. Axl ¤  [Talk]  10:04, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

The Pulse (WP:MED newsletter) June 2014
The first edition of The Pulse has been released. The Pulse will be a regular newsletter documenting the goings-on at WPMED, including ongoing collaborations, discussions, articles, and each edition will have a special focus. That newsletter is here.

The newsletter has been sent to the talk pages of WP:MED members bearing the User WPMed template. To opt-out, please leave a message here or simply remove your name from the mailing list. Because this is the first issue, we are still finding out feet. Things like the layout and content may change in subsequent editions. Please let us know what you think, and if you have any ideas for the future, by leaving a message here.

Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:23, 5 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Medicine.

BMJ offering 25 free accounts to Wikipedia medical editors
Neat news: BMJ is offering 25 free, full-access accounts to their prestigious medical journal through The Wikipedia Library and Wiki Project Med Foundation (like we did with Cochrane). Please sign up this week: BMJ --Cheers, Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Medical Translation Newsletter
 Wikiproject Medicine; Translation Taskforce

Medical Translation Newsletter

Issue 1, June/July 2014 by CFCF, Doc James

sign up for monthly delivery



This is the first of a series of newsletters for Wikiproject Medicine's Translation Task Force. Our goal is to make all the medical knowledge on Wikipedia available to the world, in the language of your choice. note: you will not receive future editions of this newsletter unless you *sign up*; you received this version because you identify as a member of WikiProject Medicine

Spotlight - Simplified article translation

Wikiproject Medicine started translating simplified articles in February 2014. We now have 45 simplified articles ready for translation, of which the first on African trypanosomiasis or sleeping sickness has been translated into 46 out of ~100 languages. This list does not include the 33 additional articles that are available in both full and simple versions.

Our goal is to eventually translate 1,000 simplified articles. This includes:
 * WHO's list of Essential Medicines
 * Neglected tropical diseases
 * Key diseases for medical subspecialties like: oncology, emergency medicine (list), anatomy, internal medicine, surgery, etc.

We are looking for subject area leads to both create articles and recruit further editors. We need people with basic medical knowledge who are willing to help out. This includes to write, translate and especially integrate medical articles.

What's happening?

I've () taken on the role of community organizer for this project, and will be working with this until December. The goals and timeline can be found here, and are focused on getting the project on a firm footing and to enable me to work near full-time over the summer, and part-time during the rest of the year. This means I will be available for questions and ideas, and you can best reach me by mail or on my talk page.
 * IEG grant

For those going to London in a month's time (or those already nearby) there will be at least one event for all medical editors, on Thursday August 7th. See the event page, which also summarizes medicine-related presentations in the main conference. Please pass the word on to your local medical editors.
 * Wikimania 2014

There has previously been some resistance against translation into certain languages with strong Wikipedia presence, such as Dutch, Polish, and Swedish. What was found is that thre is hardly any negative opinion about the the project itself; and any such critique has focused on the ways that articles have being integrated. For an article to be usefully translated into a target-Wiki it needs to be properly Wiki-linked, carry proper citations and use the formatting of the chosen target language as well as being properly proof-read. Certain large Wikis such as the Polish and Dutch Wikis have strong traditions of medical content, with their own editorial system, own templates and different ideas about what constitutes a good medical article. For example, there are not MEDRS (Polish,German,Romanian,Persian) guidelines present on other Wikis, and some Wikis have a stronger background of country-specific content.
 * Integration progress


 * Swedish Translation into Swedish has been difficult in part because of the amount of free, high quality sources out there already: patient info, for professionals. The same can be said for English, but has really given us all the more reason to try and create an unbiased and free encyclopedia of medical content. We want Wikipedia to act as an alternative to commercial sources, and preferably a really good one at that. Through extensive collaborative work and by respecting links and Sweden specific content the last unintegrated Swedish translation went live in May.
 * Dutch Dutch translation carries with it special difficulties, in part due to the premises in which the Dutch Wikipedia is built upon. There is great respect for what previous editors have created, and deleting or replacing old content can be frowned upon. In spite of this there are success stories: Anafylaxie.
 * Polish Translation and integration into Polish also comes with its own unique set of challenges. The Polish Wikipedia has long been independent and works very hard to create high quality contentfor Polish audience. Previous translation trouble has lead to use of unique templates with unique formatting, not least among citations. Add to this that the Polish Wikipedia does not allow template redirects and a large body of work is required for each article. (This is somewhat alleviated by a commissioned Template bot - to be released). - List of articles for integration
 * Arabic The Arabic Wikipedia community has been informed of the efforts to integrate content through both the general talk-page as well as through one of the major Arabic Wikipedia facebook-groups: مجتمع ويكيبيديا العربي, something that has been heralded with great enthusiasm.

Integration is the next step after any translation. Despite this it is by no means trivial, and it comes with its own hardships and challenges. Previously each new integrator has needed to dive into the fray with little help from previous integrations. Therefore we are creating guides for specific Wikis that make integration simple and straightforward, with guides for specific languages, and for integrating on small Wikis.
 * Integration guides

Instructions on how to integrate an article may be found here

News in short


 * To come
 * Medical editor census - Medical editors on different Wikis have been without proper means of communication. A preliminary list of projects is available here.
 * Proofreading drives


 * Further reading
 * Translators Without Borders
 * Healthcare information for all by 2015, a global campaign

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Draft:Mauro Ferrari, PhD
Material you included in the above draft appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://www.houstonmethodist.org/research/our-faculty/labs/ferrari-lab or elsewhere online. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:53, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but I have not submitted this for review or publication at this time- this is merely a very unfinished draft that was using this as placeholder content while I was doing research.........is it possible to leave my work in progress until I submit for review? BSW-RMH (talk) 16:45, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mauro Ferrari has been accepted
 Mauro Ferrari, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Chris Troutman ( talk ) 21:08, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!