User talk:BTM170/Archive1


 * }

signature
Signing my posts BobM3 (talk) 19:47, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

new section
BobM3 (talk) 19:47, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Anyone want to talk with me?
BobM3 (talk) 19:48, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

No one has posted anything to me yet?

I guess not.

Channel Tunnel
I haven't reverted your edits at Channel Tunnel, but just letting you know that 'defences', 'defence', 'cancelled' and 'tunnelling' are the Commonwealth way of spelling and per Manual_of_Style they are the correct way of spelling in that article. The article has a close tie to the UK. But, thanks for the grammar fixes you also did :-) --Commander Keane (talk) 02:45, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Please stop introducing U.S. spelling into a non-U.S. article, like you just did to Channel Tunnel‎. See WP:ENGVAR for the complete guideline. —EncMstr (talk) 18:59, 11 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, I apologize. But Wikidocs recommend spellchecking via a site search (site:en.Wikipedia.org) for specific common mispellings. "Cancelled", which is erroneous in American English, yields 64,400 (!!!!) Wikipedia articles containing that spelling. While plodding through these, I'm going to make mistakes.


 * Oh sorry. I see you are new.  I've added some helpful links (above) so you can get acquainted with the basics of Wikipedia.  I'm afraid I was rather harsh above; that was due to your earlier edits being previously reverted with an edit summary giving the reasons for the reversion.  As a newcomer you probably didn't notice them, and "fixed" the spelling again.  Alas, that is a common M.O. of difficult editors, particularly in esoterica like spelling variations.  No harm was done and everything was quickly resolved.  Once again, I apologize for my gruffness and hope you continue to improve Wikipedia.  Thanks!  —EncMstr (talk) 00:57, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

July 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=616016263 your edit] to Retrial of Joan of Arc may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s and 4 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:58, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I fixed the brackets. Thank you, BracketBot. BobM3 (talk) 00:09, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

January 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=641323066 your edit] to Medieval Inquisition may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:08, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * since 1418. and he was therefore hostile to a woman who had worked for the opposing side. The same was
 * members. Ascribing a diabolic origin to her victories would be an effective way to ruin her


 * I fixed the offending brackets. Thank you, BracketBot ! BobM3 (talk) 23:59, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)