User talk:BVBoze

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --ImmortalGoddezz ( t/c ) 02:22, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Kent State Stark
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam); and,
 * 4) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. --ImmortalGoddezz ( t/c ) 02:22, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi
Hello Dr. Boze!

Though I have no way to truly know it's you, I will go on good faith here. I appreciate your message. Please understand I'm not trying to cling to the past here or that I "love the old name" as some have asserted; lately I've been trying to find some consensus with other experienced, third-party editors on whether or not to change the name of the article. I am trying to help this article get better according to Wikipedia's quality standards. There are certain naming conventions and standards to promote consistency across the board in a variety of things, including naming of articles. My point was that because the article was titled "Kent State University Stark Campus," which, according to the KSU 2008 style guide is the full official name, that simply needs to be at least in the opening line, which is what was originally there. In fact, the opening sentence was the only use of the full name, with the phrase "also known as" and later "commonly referred to" using either Kent State University Stark or Kent State Stark. The entire rest of the article, both of those phrases are used to describe the school. The Wikipedia article on naming US School articles states the following: "United States school article titles should use the full official name of the school as provided by the school itself, unless the most common name for the school is significantly more well known than the official name." (see WP:NC(USS)) Even in your note, you stated the "preferred" name is Kent State University Stark, but not the official name. In addition, not only the Google search results, but also even recent news stories indicate that "Kent State University Stark Campus" is still in common usage outside of the Kent State system and is not significantly less known than "Kent State Stark" or "Kent State University Stark." And no, I did not create this article, so I did not initially title it "Kent State University Stark Campus."

Now, if Kent State University released a statement (like in the style guide for example) that officially dropped the "campus" moniker from the regional campus names that I am not aware of, then certainly, the name of the article should be changed to reflect that as should other articles on KSU's regional campuses (currently there is only one other article). But as I said, the most recent edition of the style guide uses the Ashtabula Campus as an example and specifically states that "C" should be capitalized in Campus and that "Kent State University Ashtabula Campus" was an acceptable form of the name along with "Kent State Ashtabula" and "Ashtabula Campus." It does the same for the Tuscarawas Campus ("The lecture is at the Kent State University Tuscarawas Campus."), so I have no reason to believe that the full name has changed, though it is obvious what the preferred name is just by looking at the logo. Because Wikipedia is for a worldwide audience, not just a Stark County or Ohio audience, in my opinion including "Campus" helps readers better understand the relationship between the campuses that Stark and the other campuses are part of a single university "with multiple access points" as the style guide states, rather than sister schools sharing a common name. Also, while Eric Fingerhut's statements should definitely be included in the article, they do not guide the naming of the article since it is a Wikipedia article, not a Kent State Stark or University System of Ohio article. The purpose of this article is to educate readers from around the world about the Kent State University Stark Campus; the good, the bad, and the ugly. It is not a promotional tool for the University or a secondary website that the University controls the content of in any way. (See WP:NOT and WP:COI)

Thank you for the invitation. I may be down that way soon to see a guitar concert and am very familiar with the area, though not the campus itself. As for the article, I will do my best to continue to try and improve it when I have the opportunity. It still has a ways to go and really lacks experienced editors who are familiar with Wikipedia policies on copyrighted material and structure standards for articles. For instance, most of the pictures included in the Kent State Stark article are directly from the school's own website. This is only allowed when a "free version" (i.e. one someone took on their own) isn't available AND a detailed rationale is included with the photo explaining why it needs to be included. The same holds true in the article about you; the pictures used are directly from Kent State Stark's website, meaning they are copyrighted by Kent State University. Even if the photographer uploaded them to Wikipedia, the University would still have to make some sort of official statement releasing them to the public domain or that the photographer had the rights to upload them since we have no way to know that the person who uploaded them had the rights to do so in the first place. My experience with KSU has shown that while KSU is not against their pictures being used on Wikipedia, they do not release them to the public domain; thus, Wikipedia doesn't want them (see WP:IUP).

As for "colocated", there are some instances it does have a hyphen (seems to be an acceptable spelling), but in wikilinking it, there was no hyphen (another common spelling is "collocated" with two 'L's) and the Merriam-Webster online dictionary also did not have a hyphen as did most sources when I searched for the term. My main point was that is shouldn't be capitalized (which it had been) since it isn't a proper noun or trademarked phrase, not to mention it is hardly unique to Kent State Stark and Stark State.

Best of luck in helping Kent State Stark to grow and progress as an institution. As for your Wikipedia endeavors, just be careful that you and those who may be working at Kent State Stark avoid conflict of interest in the Kent State Stark article and the article about you. It is generally good policy to avoid making edits to those articles except for rare instances. Happy editing! --JonRidinger (talk) 18:39, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:O.L. Gray.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:O.L. Gray.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:44, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Boze Betsy @ Brookside.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Boze Betsy @ Brookside.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:59, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

About the Betsy Boze article
If you have concerns about the text in the article, I'd suggest following the directions at Autobiography. There's a group of volunteers who field emails and deal with these issues—and their decisions pretty much trump those of normal editors or administrators. They can address your concerns better than I can. —C.Fred (talk) 03:40, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Millennial Leadership Initiative


A tag has been placed on Millennial Leadership Initiative requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Jinkinson  talk to me  21:24, 2 February 2014 (UTC)