User talk:BVRT11


 * Since I've already declined you once I won't be reviewing this, but I have been looking into the SPI. I had forgotten that I had some involvement in the initial block of the alleged puppeteer. After reviewing the background further I am convinced that this is indeed the same user. The attitude, and the focus on getting unblocked while failing to address the actual reason for the block are the same as Dweeby 123. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:01, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

This user has a suspiciously similar edit history to User:92.39.201.36, who in Talk:Shoprite (Isle of Man) has made it clear they were also User:31.172.174.151. Looking through the history of edits to Shoprite (Isle of Man) they are most probably also User:178.16.0.77, User:87.254.71.166, User:217.23.166.158 and a whole host of other ip addresses!

Bopalula (talk) 08:30, 11 October 2011 (UTC)


 * The thing here is that you, as a blocked editor, have to convince me, as an admin, that you will edit within policy if you're unblocked. Your reaction to being blocked here was to flip out - and to lie about sockpuppetry. This makes it really hard to trust you, as I'm sure you can see. I'll leave your request for another admin to review, as I can't approve it. You should also respond to Bopalula's comment - have you used other usernames or IPs to edit, in addition to the ones you're admitting to now? UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:16, 11 October 2011 (UTC)