User talk:BWRAEFWC

June 2021
Hello, I'm Notfrompedro. I noticed that you recently removed content from Tom Naylor without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Notfrompedro (talk) 16:36, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jack Whatmough, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. The conversion templates and sources should remain in the article. —C.Fred (talk) 16:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Let me, it is to fix my OCD BWRAEFWC (talk) 22:24, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Just let me be in charge of the Wigan pages, I’m not vandalising, I am just making sure they all follow a similar format. It isn’t doing any harm to anyone BWRAEFWC (talk) 22:25, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * How is removing content not hurting anything? —C.Fred (talk) 22:32, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sam Tickle


The article Sam Tickle has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:26, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 Wigan Athletic F.C. season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gillingham and Charlton. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Sam Tickle—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 13:54, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Ryan Bertrand, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:41, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Alex Perry (English footballer). Mattythewhite (talk) 14:28, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 Wigan Athletic F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fylde.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:12, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 Wigan Athletic F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ross Stewart.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kelland Watts, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:15, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

What did I do? BWRAEFWC (talk) 22:27, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Instead of being a muppet you could have just put a source down and then we have worked together rather than making the information wrong so you are in the wrong this is your warning. Vandalising wigan pages BWRAEFWC (talk) 22:29, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Mattythewhite (talk) 22:41, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; tålk 09:14, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Compare the warnings on this page as well as this WP:ANI report. Bishonen &#124; tålk 09:15, 28 October 2021 (UTC).

June 2022
Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Leon Mike article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 13:13, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Sorry boss man ill put it back with a source. I am from Burscough and know whats going on and have a source ill do it now for you BWRAEFWC (talk) 16:18, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Dennis McCann (boxer) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. – 2 . O . Boxing  15:22, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)