User talk:BaSzRafael

August 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Leap week calendar, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Jalen Folf  (talk)  17:57, 2 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the explanations and comments, I will follow them.
 * On the merits, the article does not contain any of the references you ask me for: there are no links pointing to where the various arguments came from. So I did the same.
 * As for the construction of calendars based on observations of cyclical astronomical phenomena - this is commonly known and rather indisputable knowledge. I didn't think it required citing sources.
 * As for the presence of strong opposition, it has been present in the past.
 * https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEhelp/calendars.html
 * calendars have held a sacred status
 * Calendars have provided (…) for maintaining cycles of religious
 * However, its adoption in the United Kingdom and other countries was fraught with confusion, controversy, and even violence
 * It also had a deeper cultural impact through the disruption of traditional festivals and calendrical practices
 * BaSzRafael (talk) 16:45, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
 * It also had a deeper cultural impact through the disruption of traditional festivals and calendrical practices
 * BaSzRafael (talk) 16:45, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
 * BaSzRafael (talk) 16:45, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Primorial sieve


A tag has been placed on Primorial sieve requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"This seems to be a promotional effort and personal essay"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Runmastery (talk) 05:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Primorial sieve for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Primorial sieve is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Primorial sieve until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. D.Lazard (talk) 13:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)