User talk:Baa/Archival Quality/February 2009

Fortified houses
Hi, Fortified houses is a substantial copy of Fortified Houses, so I have redirected it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.93.78.209 (talk) 13:14, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * That sounds decent enough, sorry about that. tutterMouse (talk) 13:17, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * can you undo the warning on my talk page? 72.93.78.209 (talk) 15:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * OK but it's not your talkpage but one used by several different users of your school and seems to get warnings quite frequently. I'm erasing it because it was erroneous this once, generally for shared educational IPs I just leave warnings. treelo  radda  16:15, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism correction
re: Artificial pacemaker

Thanks for your attempt at correction, but please note that it is best to check the history, doing a comparison on earlier files - the offending IP made a number of edits which are now reverted wholesale, rather than piecemeal by selecting a clean early version and doing a (non-changing) "edit" and "save" on it.

Best wishes, Leonard G. (talk) 23:04, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, Huggle user
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page! I feel a little guilty: MTW anti-vandalism tool doesn't show user discussion page changes, at least not in any way I've found workable. So other editors are reverting vandalism changes on my page, but I can't even see the vandalism on other people's pages! My impulse is not to change tools, but to write another. Hmm. Still haven't decided whether the effort is worth the gain. At anyhoo, thanks! Piano non troppo (talk) 09:30, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I wasn't using Huggle, I don't use Huggle on this account anymore (all that goes to TutterMouse these days) so just your regular revert. You might want to write a new tool but there's already three in common use but I think only Huggle watches across all namespaces and people would suggest to use it instead of wriitng another soley for the purpose of talkpage vandalism. I like using Huggle even though I think there's too much latency at times given the amount of calls it makes to the servers for diffs and edits so sometimes a diff may not even appear or at least that's how it is for me. I'd suggest to give it a shot but be careful, you only have to look at May 2008 in my archives to know it's a bit intense for newbs.  treelo  radda  10:43, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism?

 * Thank you for leaving me a message on my talk page. I'm glad that you've explained me your reasons for the reversion and that it wasn't in bad faith. I don't want it look admonishingly but please drop a few words about why do you revert in the edit summary the next time. 94.254.167.88 (talk) 00:33, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Huggle
Hi there, Please see the download page for the new release of huggle. It should work and should be the only version to work. Thank X  clamation point  and if you have any questions please get to me on my talk page as I will not be checking back here. -- ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e ! 21:22, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

cleaning up my userpage
Thanks, it's appreciated. :-)--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:43, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem. treelo  radda  17:49, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for repeatedly reverting the feeble attempt at insulting me. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:35, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Is it more telling that nobody else bothered to revert the attempts? I mean, one was lingering for at least a minute whilst I was fixing something else. treelo  radda  21:47, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * So I see. I'm a bit surprised one of the anti-vandalism bots didn't pick it up. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:50, 26 February 2009 (UTC)