User talk:Baba i deda

Vandalism
Your recent editing history at Unsimulated sex shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Follow the BRD process linked above, and don't mark your edits as "minor". -- Brangifer (talk) 15:41, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=615602919 your edit] to Unsimulated sex may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 ""s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:19, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=615804571 your edit] to Unsimulated sex may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 ""s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:44, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Removing talk page comments
Please do not edit or remove other people's talk page comments. Please see WP:TPG for our guidelines on expected behavior. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:50, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
Hello, I'm Petrb. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Clip (film) with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Petrb (talk) 12:08, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Unsmimulated
Hi Baba, please review the criteria for films in the list as you seem to be adding things without realizing what they actually are. Short films are not mainstream films. They are never released on their own in a wide, mainstream theatres. That one you just added is 14 minutes long. Ditto, Water in Milk Exists is not a film, it's something you'd see in an installation by the artist in an art gallery, not a regular cinema and again, it's not anywhere near the right length. Finally, never cite IMDB as an authority for anything as it's not RS. It's basically user-generated content, just like a wiki. Useful for you to check out before finding real RS, but it's not a source of verified information. ZarhanFastfire (talk) 04:44, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

I've had to remove a few more you had added that I'd not noticed. I realize English is not your first language, so you may not always get the nuances. But please be aware that when film reviewers use the words "graphic", "explicit", they are not saying that it's unsimualted. Period. What it means is, you can see someone doing something that looks a lot like something but still may not actually be something. It's like the difference between the camera showing people in bed and showing naked people writhing on the bed, or a bit of flesh in the dark as opposed to an actual genital organ attached to an actual body, etc. We cannot make claims about living persons (actors, directors) without solid, unimpeachable and unambiguous sources per WP:BLP. Also, you've been around long enough to know that references need to be formatted in a way that makes it clear what the source is without having to click on it. It's not good enough to just have a blue link that says "Release Info"--which turns out to be a link to an entry on IMDB or something else equally unacceptable. I know you mean well, just slow down a bit, take your time: there is WP:NORUSH. ZarhanFastfire (talk) 04:24, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Unsimulated again
Baba, I am glad to see you looking for and finding better sources. Just one thing. Please stop using abbreviations such as h/c and s/c, HC or SC. It's not encyclopedic. Do you think the average person out there, outside the context of this article, has ever seen these before? I guarntee you they have not. We can't use random unestablished abbreviations in an encyclopedia. I notice you are even taking existing sentences where "hardcore" is used and replacing it with "h/c". Why? To make it shorter? These are not details, they are the basis for whether the entry even exists. This is like point form, coming across incomplete and unprofessional. And please work on your English grammar in general, particularly articles. ZarhanFastfire (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2018 (UTC)