User talk:Babagyan

Feedback
thank you all for your feedback.The things are improved according your feedbacks. thank you all

Dear administrator, do you know the region odisha, and gone through the contributions sited in odisha.i dont think so.I dont have to say anything. it is your power. I will go for other site. If you still feel it should stay there please undelete. Thank you babagyan "Special:Undelete/ " — Preceding unsigned comment added by babagyan (talk • contribs)

Speedy deletion nomination of Madhab Chandra Jena
Hello Babagyan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Madhab Chandra Jena for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. JamKaftan (talk) 17:15, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Babagyan, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Proposed deletion of Madhab Chandra Jena's Research on Solar Power Generation Efficiency


The article Madhab Chandra Jena's Research on Solar Power Generation Efficiency has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Appears to be Original Research.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. red dogsix (talk) 03:22, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Latest research on solar power generation efficiency for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Latest research on solar power generation efficiency is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Latest research on solar power generation efficiency until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheInfernoX (talk) 04:39, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Latest research on solar power generation efficiency


The article Latest research on solar power generation efficiency has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Appears to be Original Research.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheInfernoX (talk) 05:52, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Madhab Chandra Jena's Research on Solar Power Generation Efficiency


A tag has been placed on Madhab Chandra Jena's Research on Solar Power Generation Efficiency requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://ijmr.net.in/download.php?filename=FukGxRzPaFA7dWT.pdf&new=IJITE2324Feb3.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. bonadea contributions talk 07:51, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Latest research on solar power generation efficiency


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Latest research on solar power generation efficiency, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://ijmr.net.in/pastijite.php?p=VOLUME%203,ISSUE%202,FEBRUARY,2015 . (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
 * It covers a topic on which we already have an article - Madhab Chandra Jena's Research on Solar Power Generation Efficiency. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Madhab Chandra Jena's Research on Solar Power Generation Efficiency, or to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
 * It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TheInfernoX (talk) 08:04, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Maximum power point tracking. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 08:04, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Madhab Chandra Jena's Research on Solar Power Generation Efficiency


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Madhab Chandra Jena's Research on Solar Power Generation Efficiency requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mitch Ames (talk) 08:28, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Attack pages
Please do not create attack pages like you did at Madhab Chandra Jena's Research on Solar Power Generation Efficiency. Attacks against editors are not tolerated on Wikipedia and if you continue, this can lead to you getting permanently blocked from editing. The reason the page had been previously deleted was because it was a copyright infringement of [ http://ijmr.net.in/download.php?filename=FukGxRzPaFA7dWT.pdf&new=IJITE2324Feb3.pdf this site]. Even if you claim to own the copyright to the text Wikipedia cannot accept any material that has previously been published elsewhere. In this case it looks like the article was open access so copyright isn't entirely an issue, but there was still another valid reason for deletion: the article was just a repost of a journal article and did not show how this journal article passed notability guidelines per WP:GNG. Wikipedia is not like journal databases in that it is not a place that hosts original work like journal articles, books, or other original content. If a specific journal article is particularly notable then there can be an entry about it, but this would require that the journal article be the focus of independent and reliable sources. You cannot post the article verbatim to Wikipedia. I also note that this appears to be an attempt to get around the repeated deletions and salting of the article Madhab Chandra Jena.

Now as far as the article for Jena goes, you have to go through deletion review to have this restored. It cannot be restored at WP:REFUND since it was deleted via WP:A7, "Article about a real person, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject". However when you do this you will need to show where Jena and his work has received coverage in independent and reliable sources. By this I mean that you can show things like academic texts that routinely quote his works, newspaper articles about him, and so on. Having a large citation index to his name is also helpful, as that can also show that his work is routinely cited by his peers. I noted that the article mentioned awards- you should bring these up at deletion review and show proof that they are awarded. Be careful, however, as not all awards are considered to be notable per Wikipedia's guidelines. This doesn't mean that the awards weren't a challenge to receive, just that there are so many awards out there that Wikipedia is very, very strict on what it will consider to be a notable award and what it will consider a reliable source.

But going back to the main reason I'm posting here, do not post anything that disparages other editors on Wikipedia. Not only is this not permitted on Wikipedia but it is also very poorly received by other editors and can make them less likely to want to help you. If you do decide to go to deletion review, do not make ad hominem remarks. Stay calm and give your reasons for wanting the article restored and give proof to back your claims up. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:06, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, please do not repost any of the content on Jena until you go through deletion review. If you continue to repost this information without going through deletion review you will almost certainly be permanently blocked from editing for being disruptive. The only way to restore this content right now is to go through deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:19, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Other site
I note that you also created but the standard of your English here and on my user talk page leads me to suspect that you may not actually be Madhab Chandra Jena. I note your comment above "I will go for other site". If that means that you intend to publish somewhere other than Wikipedia, I strongly recommend you to do that. Even if the copyvio situation were resolved, your articles would be deletable as original research. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:08, 3 May 2015 (UTC)