User talk:Babak Mirsalehi

October 2019
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to 65th Airborne Special Forces Brigade, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 21:20, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

February 2020
Your recent editing history at Iran-Iraq War shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.} WCM email 15:39, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited H-3 airstrike, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IRIAF ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/H-3_airstrike check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/H-3_airstrike?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

IRIAF size
Hi Babak, please refrain from changing number of personnel in Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force or any other information without providing a reliable source. Wikipedia is also not a source. Pahlevun (talk) 21:50, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Operation Martyr Soleimani. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 22:57, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Use talk pages
You posted a comment on User:Pahlevun instead of User talk:Pahlevun. Please revert yourself and converse on the talk page, not on the user's page. Thanks! ~Anachronist (talk) 23:44, 24 April 2020 (UTC)