User talk:Babakhorasan

Welcome
Hello, Babakhorasan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Qwyrxian (talk) 06:06, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Akhun Khel
Hi again. Please note that the mention above about the need for sources isn't an optional one. If you cannot provide sources for the information you want to add, you simply cannot add it. Exceptions exist for statements that everyone will clearly agree with, but any extensive historical info like this is clearly not obviously correct, so it needs sources. Also, all of that "family tree" info does not belong in the article at all, per WP:NOT. We provide encyclopedic overviews of topics, not exhaustive lists of details. As such, you can't add that info, even if sourcing were somehow possible. Please ask if you have any questions; however, continuing to add the same unsourced, inappropriate info could potentially result in your editing privileges being blocked. That's really not necessary if you'll follow the policies/guidelines, and I'd be happy to help in any way that I can. But simply adding and re-adding the info is not the right way to go. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:08, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Akhun chalak baba


The article Akhun chalak baba has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced, non-neutral, no evidence of notability, apparently original research (all the edits seem to be by one person), generally confusing and unencyclopaedic. Fails WP:VER, WP:POV, WP:GNG, WP:OR

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. andy (talk) 11:36, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Akhunbaba for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page.