User talk:BabbarBaloch

April 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Babbar (surname), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. JML1148 (Talk &#124; Contribs) 07:03, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Babbar (surname), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  Yoshi24517 ( Chat ) ( Online ) 18:31, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Babbar (surname). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  Yoshi24517  ( Chat ) ( Online ) 18:42, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Babbar (surname), you may be blocked from editing.  Yoshi24517 ( Chat ) ( Online ) 18:43, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Babbar (Tribe). --  Wesoree  ( talk · contribs ) 18:48, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Babbar (surname) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --  Wesoree  ( talk · contribs ) 18:58, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --  Wesoree  ( talk · contribs ) 19:00, 1 May 2023 (UTC)


 * only i was not edit warring the other angelicdevil guy was edit warring with his recent sources....babbar is my tribe and i know better about it with sources as old as 1634 but who the hell is to edit about my tribe with his own biased sources....
 * Once i am unblock i will edit that page again with my new old sources ...and you will se he again will start and edit war..... BabbarBaloch (talk) 10:24, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 19:12, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

No personal attacks
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Babbar (Tribe). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:17, 19 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello, BabbarBaloch,
 * I was shocked to see your edit summaries on this article. If you continue to attack other editors, you will be facing an indefinite block. We do not resolve content disputes on Wikipedia by insulting each other. This conduct will not be permitted in the future. Liz Read! Talk! 02:20, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Why the hell is angelic devil speaking for my tribe and writing and editing with newer biased sources written after 1900s while i edit with sources older than 1850 ...he is involved in an edit war with me and you guys are blind BabbarBaloch (talk) 03:28, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Babbar (tribe), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. DMacks (talk) 02:36, 22 May 2023 (UTC)


 * if there is any way to report someone i want to report @AngelicDevil29 he has been personally attacking me first ...you can check the edit record all abuses came from his side first he is a sindhi nationalist who wants to sindhize every baloch tribe just to increase their population..have on look tha edit page of Babbar and see what remarks he left in his last 5 edits full of abuse ,harrasment and you blind fools are only blocking me from editing BabbarBaloch (talk) 03:05, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * You can't even stop being abusive in this request for assistance? No, that's a non-starter. DMacks (talk) 03:09, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * sorry i was bit heated up because of what he wrote in the edit remarks didn't you guys see? Have a look and tell me yourself..block him as well if you are just because he abused me first.. BabbarBaloch (talk) 03:30, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * They have received a final warning. If they do it again, they'll be blocked. DMacks (talk) 03:32, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Also, please be careful: editors do not have any special authority over a topic just because they have personal knowlege, such as being part of a certain ethnic group. As you have seen, it can be hard to keep personal feelings and what you "know" at bay, and instead remain WP:CIVIL and use only WP:RS. DMacks (talk) 03:36, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I have contemporary sources which are most authentic in any case ..but that guy kept editing with newer biased sources...he hasn't abused for the first though and he just got a warning 😶 BabbarBaloch (talk) 03:47, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia has become such a mess the most unauthentic source to study...everyone can edit whatever he wants and specially the administration is so biased and lazy... BabbarBaloch (talk) 09:00, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I was busy i didn't saw these msgs, but now i have read them, so lets be honest, my only intentions are to provide right and correct information to the people who read Wikipedia, and that was thr only reason i joined Wikipedia, there were so many articles about tribes/castes which were written as baloch, same goes for babbar tribe, a common sense tells you that a single one source cant be taken as truth i have mentioned 10s of references and sources but mr babbarbaloch had only excuse to call them baised british written, and as far as harassment i concerned i never harassed anyone on Wikipedia, it was Babbarbaloch who started abusing and swearing personal attacking me, but i didnt replied him in his way, cuz i knew their background, and then after a month he appeared again editing local written books about babbar tribe, and then i realized hes not going listen sweettalk, and now hes playing victim card over here. Its honestly so funny, as i know how baloch mentality is. Thanks. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 12:02, 22 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Continued harrassment and abusive comments by BabbarBaloch. DMacks (talk) 13:51, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. 331dot (talk) 12:47, 22 May 2023 (UTC)