User talk:Bablasona

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Resurgent insurgent 13:01, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Stealth Trading
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Stealth Trading, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The subject is already covered in encyclopedic detail in insider trading. Do not make a duplicate article that contains your personal commentary on the practice. Resurgent insurgent 13:01, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Going by what you wrote: "Insiders may use stealth trading as a means to execute their trades but insider trading does not have to be done through stealth trading or trade fragmentation." it seems that by your own words, stealth trading is insider trading but not vice versa.

Even if the articles should be separate, your version had an unacceptable tone for an encyclopedia article. It did not even define just what "stealth trading" was. It read more like an advertising blurb for a book on insider trading, only with a references section thrown in. Resurgent insurgent 18:18, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

And your last message is a good reason why you should write in the insider trading article instead. An "original written piece" constitutes original research which is not allowed on Wikipedia. Resurgent insurgent 18:19, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I was mistaken on the point immediately above this one. But the question of encyclopedic tone still stands. If you can write an article that does attempt to provide a concise definition of "stealth trading" before elaborating and does not sound so advertorial in tone (look at insider trading for an example of neutral tone suitable for encyclopedia article), by all means write a new article in place of the old one. Until and unless that happens, the redirect is a suitable replacement. Resurgent insurgent 18:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Stealth Trading listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Stealth Trading. Since you had some involvement with the Stealth Trading redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:08, 2 August 2017 (UTC)