User talk:Babub/Archive2

Congrats
Hi! I am a bit late probably. Anyway, congrats for Adi Shankara getting featured.--Dwaipayan (talk) 14:21, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

anti-Brahmanist edits on Anti-Brahmanism
Hi,

I could surely use help in the Anti-Brahmanism article and the Talk:Anti-Brahmanism page where I believe that User:Holywarrior is touting rabidly anti-Brahmanist statements (and edits) and demanding that self-professed anti-Brahmin Kancha Ilaiah be sourced as an authority on anti-Brahminism (an argument as absurd as quoting Hitler on anti-Semitism I should say). Thanks.

Shiva&#39;s Trident 17:11, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Babub, I only added it because Holywarrior would have accused me of vandalism otherwise. "here" (I chopped off the e). Thanks for removing it.Bakaman Bakatalk 21:34, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

In light of what happened to Subhash_Bose, I guess us Indian users need to stick together. I request you to keep Brahminism, anti-Brahminism, Indian caste system etc. on your watchlist. There are many eager contributors like Ajaypal2k & User:Sfacets (nice guy) but a couple of bad apples seem to be infecting the bunch.Bakaman Bakatalk 22:00, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Expanding Persecution of Hindus

 * Hi,
 * I saw that you've been fixing up the Persecution of Hindus article and was wondering:
 * Do you have any info of regarding the situation with Hindus in Fiji? I remember back in India during the late 90s some reports of Hindus being attacked and persecuted. I have found only this:

http://www.hinduamericanfoundation.org/media_press_release_hhr2005_endorsements.htm


 * with not much specific information regarding Fiji other than a couple of mentions. Could you look a bit for info if you can spare the effort? Also the article Hinduism in Fiji does not refer to any such incidents.


 * Thanks.

Hkelkar 19:48, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 12:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Manu Smriti issues
Hi,

There is a debate brewing about a quote taken from ManuSmriti and it's interpretation. I could use more knowledgable persons offerring perspective in the matter.

Over this edit

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Manu_Smriti&diff=73978451&oldid=73977879

And this duscussion:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AManu_Smriti&diff=74160223&oldid=73179220


 * Plz offer opinions, any sources you may have that I don't know about etc. Thanks.Hkelkar 16:57, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Atheism AfD
Hey man, shouldn't we channel our energies to cleaning up POV instead of senseless arguments with our Hindu brethren? You and nids were almost FundyWatching each other.Bakaman Bakatalk 01:54, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Possible vandal on several articles like the 2006 blasts at Malegaon

 * I think that some of the recent edits made by an anonymous ip are vandalism.
 * His contrib history is below:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=86.143.175.215


 * Particularly vandalistic are his edits of Eurabia and Bajrang Dal. He has also vandalized my user page, rehashing the old sockpuppetry accusation which has been closed. I have reported him for vandalism, but he continues to vandalize the articles and my fixing it might get me above 3RR. I feel that these edits are vandalistic and so, in my opinion, 3RR does not apply.However, since users have been banned for violating even the precept of 3RR before I'd like your opinion on the situation, since I'm still quite new to wikipedia. Please advise. Thank you.Hkelkar 21:43, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Hinduism in Gujarat
created. Ask Gizza for help with the template.Bakaman Bakatalk 23:10, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Great work
Your contributions to wikipedia are great, expecialy the Hinduism articles. I have been very interested in the Smarta tradition, did you make any contributions to that article. -- Littlewing1 14:43, 10 September 2006 (UTC) Thank's p.s where did you get the smarta userbox I cant find it

Problem on anti-Brahmanism again

 * Holywarrior (now known as "Ikonoblast") has put NPOV tag on the article without explanation. I believe that the article is balanced.If you have opinion to offer please do so in the talk page:

Diff:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anti-Brahmanism&diff=75075765&oldid=75071571

Hkelkar 22:30, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Atheism in Hinduism
Babub, please know that I don't agree with even an atheist can be a Hindu. I wrote in that rambling nonsense to make Nid happy. I don't think one can be a hindu unless one believes in the Vedas, which definitely affirms the existence of God.

don't worry. I don't agree with the rambling nonsense I wrote.

Raj2004 23:26, 13 September 2006 (UTC) I agree!

Raj2004 09:39, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

userpage vandal
of course, this is Bose or some other blocked Hindutva kook. I can't be bothered to pursue it (it's not annoying enough), but if you like, you can collect the vadal edits and ask WP:RFU if they can come up with a rangeblock. dab (&#5839;) 07:58, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

I nominated this ridiculous nonsense article Neo-Brahmanism for speedy deletion
I cited reasons there. Can you offer a perspective (maybe on the talk page)? Also, could you put the article in your watchlist for developments (in cse you're interested, of course)? Thanks for your attention.Hkelkar 19:29, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Article just got deleted. Wow Wikipedia sure is fast :).Hkelkar 19:31, 15 September 2006 (UTC)