User talk:BabyBoy221

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, BabyBoy221! Thank you for your contributions. I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! CupcakePerson13 (talk) 12:27, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * The Teahouse, our help forum for new users
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

hi can you add jung eunji from Apink in singers with four octaves, i don't know how many octaves she have but she can whistle you can watch her videos thanks Singerclassical2020 (talk) 14:42, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wendy (singer), you may be blocked from editing. ''I has come to my attention that you have been continuously vandalising the mentioned page for the past few month. The source you have provided is not consider reliable source and is also not verifiable. In addition, it also does not meet WP:BLP.'' – Paper9oll | Talk:Paper9oll 16:55, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

If it's not reliable source, why it was posted there, and what kind of source do you have in putting data? as a fan I'm just helping to add info, and it's not vandalizing, how do you define vandalizing? why adding an info was vandalizing? BabyBoy221 (talk) 17:00, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Plus that added category is open to all who wanted to add someone on their list, they even put the direction on how to add an artist on their list, then why it's suddenly not allowed to add Wendy when in fact that information is already proven?, watch YouTube so you could at least get more informations. BabyBoy221 (talk) 17:03, 10 December 2020 (UTC)


 * No one is stopping you from adding information, but please use reliable news sources instead. And, fyi Wikipedia is not fancraft. I would highly recommended you to read the links I have linked above. – Paper9oll | Talk:Paper9oll 17:35, 10 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Kpop analysis is the only source that is posting about kpop vocalists, even the other artist on the that category list was only took from an article. Korea don't really do much articles about genuine vocalist, that's why professionals only makes their own analysis through vlogs or blog posting, even videos on YouTube was saying the same thing, whenever I pasted the link, it says error, so just search this on YT so you can see it for yourself : Top 20 KPOP female idols with the widest vocal range BabyBoy221 (talk) 18:37, 10 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Wendy was even praised by a well known music critique in SK, it was full Korean, so I don't know if you can understand that. http://weeklymunhak.com/24/309/ BabyBoy221 (talk) 18:48, 10 December 2020 (UTC)


 * As I have repeatedly said so, the source MUST meet WP:Reliable sources, WP:Verifiable, WP:Self Publish, and WP:BLP guidelines. As long the mentioned 4 guidelines are met then it can included else the answer is pretty much clear. Furthermore, it doesn't matter if that is the only sources available as WP:Self Publish guidelines stated "Never use self-published sources as third-party sources about living people, even if the author is an expert, well-known professional researcher, or writer." hence the source you have provided already fails to meet the guidelines. In addition, YouTube videos generally can't be use as reference (read WP:Videos as references), there are however exception to this, quote "official YouTube channels created by agencies and organizations that themselves are generally considered reliable" hence if the videos is created by official channels it can be used. The YouTube video you have provided is consider WP:Self Publish hence it has fail to meet the guidelines. – Paper9oll | Talk:Paper9oll 05:08, 11 December 2020 (UTC)


 * It was just a related category, and I don't even see other reliable sources that stated that those on the list are proven, but only articles based in music critics or professionals comments. So I don't see why it's not allowed to add it on this particular singer? it feels like you don't want someone to be recognized to her own capability. For just adding a category is already vandalizing but you guys didn't see how the other wikis or profiles was full of misinformations and toxicity. BabyBoy221 (talk) 05:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Not sure if you're being ignorant or just a fan that want things to go your way. As I have mentioned twice, you need your sources to met the guidelines. And the other singers in that category, most are notable for their vocal range and have reliable source writing about it, they are not single source and are also not self-published. You can go ahead if you want (since you don't seem to like following instructions/advices), but do not that your edit will be reverted and reported to administrator for further actions to be taken. – Paper9oll | Talk:Paper9oll 06:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC)