User talk:BabyCake000

Recent edit to Brian Stelter
Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person (Brian Stelter), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:02, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nick Fuentes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Meters (talk) 06:11, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Mike Cernovich, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Meters (talk) 06:13, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

How about don't try libel people. BabyCake000 (talk) 06:15, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * You might want to read WP:NLT. I restored material sourced to many sources, including such reliable sources such as CNN and the New York Times. Meters (talk) 06:24, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Well it cleatly states "he doesnt't identify as such" so if he doesn't identify as such why would you put that in the front page of his biography? BabyCake000 (talk) 06:26, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * And that's why we say "He has been characterized as a part of the alt-right" with a list of reliable sources, followed by "but does not identify as such." with refs for that. If you want to propose a change then discuss it on the article's talk page. Meters (talk) 06:31, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

So as long as someone subjectively "characterizes" someone as something regardless if true its okay to put it in the front page of the bio? BabyCake000 (talk) 06:35, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Again, take it to the article's talk page. Meters (talk) 06:36, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Sure thing 'meters' BabyCake000 (talk) 06:37, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Did you have to get rid of the "convicted felon" on Avenattis page, I mean come on, he is a convicted felon, and not a "attorney" because he doesn't have a license to practice law anymore. BabyCake000 (talk) 06:56, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * There is no source in the article saying he has been disbarred yet, and I cannot find one. If you have one then provide the source. Otherwise all we can say (and we do say) is that he is on "involuntary inactive status" and is likely to be disbarred. Meters (talk) 03:55, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Your kind of a god though for adding it back not gonna lie BabyCake000 (talk) 04:55, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Carlos Maza. Larry Hockett (Talk) 08:36, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

But it was true though BabyCake000 (talk) 08:36, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 00:15, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 01:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Can you just reinstate me if i promise to only edit for constructive purposes? BabyCake000 (talk) 09:14, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

-_- BabyCake000 (talk) 14:13, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Metersssssss, cmonnnn BabyCake000 (talk) 09:15, 19 March 2020 (UTC)