User talk:BabylonTheGreat

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello BabylonTheGreat! Your additions to Mara Orendain La Torre have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  — twotwofourtysix (My talk page and contributions) 06:18, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Mara Orendain La Torre.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mara Orendain La Torre.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:20, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * The above also applies to File:Mara La Torre.jpeg. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:20, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Mara La Torre, photo from Flickr.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mara La Torre, photo from Flickr.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Marchjuly (talk) 11:50, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Since you're now claiming that this image comes from Flickr, please add a link to the Flickr account where you found the image to the file's page so that its licensing can be verified. Simply stating it comes from Flickr isn't going to be sufficient and there needs to be some way to verify the file's licensing. In addition (and this part is very important), you're going to need to show that the image was first published on Flickr by its copyright holder under such a license before it was subsequently published anywhere else under a different license in order to eliminate any Flickr washing concerns. Media organizations do sometimes take photos they find on Flickr and use them in articles, but it needs to be clearly shown that the file had been previously been released under a free license that Wikipedia accepts. If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask them below or at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. If it can be shown that this file has been released under a cc-zero or any other free license that Wikipedia accepts, then the upload should probably be tagged for a move to Commons since that's a better place to for such licenses to be hosted. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:26, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * The link you provided to Flickr states that photo was uploaded to Flickr on February 8, 2022. The file was first uploaded to Wikipedia on November 25, 2021, as File:Mara Orendain La Torre.jpg and can be seen here uploaded to Instagram on November 18, 2021. Both of these publications precede the file being uploaded to Flickr which means that Flickr account is almost certainly not the original source of image; moreover, the Flickr account states it was created in 2022 which again shows it can't be the original source of the image. So, you're going to need the copyright holder of the photo (for reference, the copyright holder of a photo is the person who takes it, not the subject of the photo) to email their WP:CONSENT to Wikimedia VRT for this image to be kept. If, by chance, you mistakenly assumed that all that was needed was for the file to be uploaded to Flickr after it's been previously published somewhere else online, then that was a mistake. An image previously published online under one license can't subsequently be uploaded to Flickr and then re-released under a different license. Such a thing is considered to be license laundering and such licenses aren't considered valid by Wikipedia. I'm going to assume you meant no real harm here and this was just a good faith mistake based upon a misunderstanding as to how copyright works; however, you should be advised that this is the kind of thing that can lead to an account being blocked by a Wikipedia administrator if it's established that it was intentionally done to try and mislead or deceive others. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:57, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Mara La Torre photo from Flickr.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mara La Torre photo from Flickr.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:59, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mara Orendain La Torre.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mara Orendain La Torre.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:59, 9 February 2022 (UTC)