User talk:Bacchus87

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Uckfield
Could you please explain your reasons for nominating Talk:Uckfield for deletion? Ironholds (talk) 14:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * That is fair enough; could you explain that at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Uckfield so the MfD can be closed down? And don't forget to sign your posts by typing ~ at the end. Ironholds (talk) 15:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Just saw you did it; my apologies for the pointless message, heh :P. Ironholds (talk) 15:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Fetal farming
I've declined to speedy delete this as an attack page. It's certainly POV, though as a term it may be in use. I suggest taking it to WP:AfD to get more eyes on it and to see if the information is covered somewhere else. AniMate talk  00:53, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Yafeu Fula
I have contested your speedy deletion, please see Talk:Yafeu Fula. decltype (talk) 12:58, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Volt (soft drink)
Okay, I may have been premature in declaring it notable. But if the predictions come true, this article will appear on Wikipedia eventually.

Thanks for at least telling me. I think it should be standard practice. Vchimpanzee ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 16:01, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Fetal farming
Hi there, several alternative redirect targets have now been proposed, could you comment on which you prefer? Tim Vickers (talk) 18:49, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Vandlism reverted
Hope you don't mind me editing your user page. &mdash; Deon555talkI'm BACK!  14:15, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that, damn disruptive IP's Bacchus87 (talk) 14:19, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Rand Paul
Rand Paul has been overhauled. This may affect your comments at Articles for deletion/Rand Paul. This message is being copied to 8 people. JJB 07:49, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
More info - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 03:03, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Your rollback request
Hello Bacchus87, I have granted your account rollback in accordance with your request. Please remember that rollback is for reverting vandalism/spam, and that misuse of the tool, either by revert-warring with other users, or simply reverting edits you disagree with, can lead to it being removed. For practice, you may wish to see New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 23:05, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Re: Thank You!!
No problem :-), I'm sure you would've done the same for me. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 00:57, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

How is correcting a page...vandalizing it?
Leave it alone. Go do something with you life. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickvelo (talk • contribs) 19:40, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Letterbomb05 Article
The recent addition you removed was made by the owner of the article up for SD just FYI. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 20:57, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Cheers, didn't see it was up for SD, was about to put it up for that myself, think there may be some WP:COI there Bacchus87 (talk) 20:59, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The now red link in this discussion header says it all really doesn't it? Lol. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 21:29, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Trans woman
My changes to Trans woman are not Vandalism, so rein in the leash on your bot and try actually taking a look at an edit before you revert it. 142.177.63.72 (talk) 21:13, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I did look at the edits, as others have said copy and paste moves damage the site so if you could suggest the move as other people have said then we can discuss and do a proper move with consensus, hope this makes it clearer. Please don't keep making major changes such as this without discussion when they are reverted. Bacchus87 (talk) 21:17, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Jock Stein
Is dead and he covered up a pedophile scandal at Celtic, you know he did.
 * Do you have any form of reliable source for that?? Bacchus87 (talk) 23:02, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my personal page. I'm not sure that the contributor quite understands what wikipedia is for. Grblundell (talk) 10:33, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

delete or hide my User committed identity
I'd like to delete or hide my User committed identity --Q Valda (talk) 20:06, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, as you were deleting infomation on your user page with an IP I assumed vandalism. Bacchus87 (talk) 20:09, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Why are you changing my edits to Blue Falcon?
I'm changing them because they're correct! There's no other Blue Falcon! Let my changes be good! Please! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.7.204.215 (talk) 21:40, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I reverted this |this edit as you removed the disambig tag and 2 links from the page with explanation for only 1 of them, which was unsourced. If you could please elaborate as to why this edit was made? Bacchus87 (talk) 21:49, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

I removed them because there's no proof, there's only 1 Blue Falcon, Really! Please That Page has to be deleted! i looked on the website of that army division, no Blue Falcons. So please those other Blue falcon stuff including that folk tale (because i looked everywhere on the internet) should be deleted). Also The Disney Peter Pan page should be deleted for it's still Peter Pan!24.7.204.215 (talk) 21:59, 12 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Well a quick search on google turns out a number of sources for the army division, folk tale and the ship. As there are sources proving their existance, it's gonna take something major to disprove that, you must provide sources with your claims. With respect to the Disney Peter Pan thing, what is that?? It's a major, notable film so deserving of its own page. Bacchus87 (talk) 22:05, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Hey Bacchus Maybe you can guide me to how i can post things here without them being considered Vandalism?
Can you teach me all about working here at wikipedia?24.7.204.215 (talk) 22:02, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

OK, i'll go get some sources
OK, i'll go get some sources —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.34.242.206 (talk) 18:00, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Mi contribucion no es vandalismo
Hola Bacchus87, te pido que me expliques porque consideras mi contribucion como vandalismo; es que acaso no estoy dando la fuente de informacion? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.63.66.35 (talk) 18:16, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry going to reply in english because my spanish isn't so good. Suggesting PC World is calling Vista the gayest operating system of all time is not appropriate without sources, which I very much doubt exists. By all means try and find reliable sources and post them if you find any. Bacchus87 (talk) 18:20, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

User 216.249.131.252
Hello, I noticed you caught this person vandalising pages last night, as did I. Sadly, after your final warning, he did it again to Stephen King and Wes Craven's pages. I don't know how to impose a block or I would do so myself, so I thought I'd drop you a line and humbly ask for your assistance in this matter. Thank you. 76.89.161.88 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:52, 14 August 2009 (UTC).

Whoops! I see you got those already. My bad!76.89.161.88 (talk) 06:55, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Reverted edits to Medicare+Choice
Greetings-

I am re-doing the edits to Medicare+Choice that you reverted.

1) 'beneficiaries' is clearly a more appropriate term than 'members' - see wikipedia entry on Medicare (US) or US Govt materials, or compare Google frequency.

2) adding 'that' makes sentence read more clearly - is stylistically superior.

My bad for not including edit summary, but I thought merit was obvious.

67.173.243.184 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:09, 15 August 2009 (UTC). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.175.66.7 (talk)

Berlino
I've just listed the article under AfD. I think it is relevant, but there is not enough info for an own article. There is no so much to tell about Berlino that is couldn't be merged into the athletics world championships article. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 19:28, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Neil Berry (disambiguation)
I have nominated Neil Berry (disambiguation), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Neil Berry (disambiguation). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cnilep (talk) 17:51, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

One Day Like This
Snow Patrol covered the song, which was also released as a bside. I still think the category should stand. Plus, you did not give any reason for removing it. See Crack the Shutters. Suede67 (talk) 18:55, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I removed it as there was no mention of Snow Patrol on One Day Like This, as it has been covered by Snow Patrol, might mention it in the article. My edit summary was done automatically and I didn't think it was controversial as unmentioned in article.Bacchus87 (talk) 14:35, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem, nothing controversial. :) Suede67 (talk) 16:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Thomas...
Hey there. Sorry I didn't get around to it earlier. It appears everything was all taken care of? I was unable to see the discussion on the page you linked though (I am guessing it was archived already?). Anyway in future don't hesitate to post to me again, I would be happy to give my view especially when I place up CSD.Calaka (talk) 07:57, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

mm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.175.66.113 (talk) 13:50, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity
Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)