User talk:Bachibz~enwiki

> Any particular reason you felt you needed to remove referenced material from Kevin Spacey? fishhead64 15:36, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Any particular reason you feel you need to relentlessly reinsert questionable tabloïd material that has nothing to do with the subject (i.e. the actor's career and the public sides of his personal life)? I already explained my reasons for deleting the sexual stuff in the general discussion. Correct me if I am wrong: Wikipedia is not a branch of the National Inquirer, is it? As an administrator, I think you should know.

Besides, given your personal profile, this behavior seems really odd, that's the least I can say...

Best wishes. Bachibz.


 * Bachbiz, i don't know what my profile has to do with my interest in having comprehensive articles with verifiable information. The fact is, public speculation concerning a subject's personal life can be notable, and there are abundant examples on Wikipedia (see, for example here or here).  In fact there are whole articles speculating on the sexuality and sexual relationships of notable figures (see, for example, Alexander the Great's personal relationships).  If you are going to make the argument that the information is unencyclopedic, make it on the talk page - the only reason so far that you offered there is that it is speculative, which (as you can see) is not in and of itself grounds for its removal.  The information I include does not speculate about Spacey's sexual orientation (which is something only the subject himself knows) nor that he has had same-sex relationships (again, not publicly known).  What it does say is that there has been public speculation, and Spacey has denied its content.  In what way is this objectionable?  fishhead64 06:37, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

GA reassessment of Kevin Spacey
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns with the article which you can see at Talk:Kevin Spacey/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:11, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Bachibz. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Bachibz~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 22:25, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 10:50, 22 April 2015 (UTC)