User talk:Backbycommittee

Welcome!

Hello, Backbycommittee, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --B (talk) 23:31, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Chad Spann
Please stop trying to create a promotional article at Chad Spann. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for self-promotion and flowery language (e.g. "A lot of hard work and a little bit of luck helped Spann rise up the depth charts very quickly") is not permitted under our neutral point of view policy. As none of your claims are cited, they constitute original research. Wikipedia strongly discourages editors from creating or editing articles about themselves. If you continue trying to make this a promotional piece, you will be blocked. --B (talk) 13:45, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

I'm trying to get the hang of this....i have sources for all of the information i've posted. i have no idea how to ref them. i will change the language to not sound so "flowery", but all the information is accurate.

here are a few:
 * http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/colleges/post/_/id/1528/nius-spann-following-rich-tradition
 * http://waltercamp.org/index.php/teams_and_awards/player_of_the_week/
 * http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=3128316
 * http://www.huskiewire.com/articles/2010/12/18/98746710/index.xml
 * http://www.niuhuskies.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/120110aaa.html
 * http://couriernews.suntimes.com/sports/2642705-419/player-spann-award-football-won.html
 * http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/player/profile?playerId=237698
 * http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/boxscore?gameId=272442459
 * http://www.nflpagame.com/press/news/175-nfl-players-association-game-finalizes-rosters-
 * Please see cite web and WP:REF, which describe how to use the citation templates. The short version is that you want to do something like this:

This is a fact, which I am attributing to the ESPN story. This will get automatically transformed into:
 * This is a fact, which I am attributing to the ESPN story.

Then, at the bottom of the article, we add the reflist template, which will display the actual reference as a footnote:

Also, please sign your talk page comments using four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically get turned into a stamp displaying your name and the date. If I can be of assistance, please let me know. --B (talk) 16:21, 25 February 2011 (UTC)