User talk:BadBull

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Mak (talk)  23:35, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Advertising added to various book-related pages
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. -- Orange Mike 07:32, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

AfD Etiquette
Per the etiquette information contained at WP:AFD, please do not make your recommendation to "not delete" the article Victor Celorio more than once in the AfD. Other editors reserve the privilege to strike out these "double votes". If you wish, you may preface additional comments with a word such as "comment". Thank you. -- Kinu t /c  02:31, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Go easy on your agenda
Your aggressive promotion of Victor Celorio and InstaBook led to trouble last time. Learn to be a more neutral wikipedia contributor instead of pushing an agenda and things will go better. Dicklyon 00:45, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Another aggressive promotion of Victor Celorio in the Digital library article. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a billboard! Mogh 22:03, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Problematic username
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and I am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?

I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.

You have several options freely available to you:
 * If you can relieve my concern through discussing it here, I can stop worrying about it.
 * If the two of us can't agree here, we can ask for help through Wikipedia's dispute resolution process, such as requesting comments from other Wikipedians. Wikipedia administrators usually abide by agreements reached through this process.
 * You can keep your contributions history under a new username. Visit Changing username and follow the guidelines there.

-- Orange Mike 14:14, 3 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I've read the user name policy and I don't think that I'm not respecting it, If you could be more specific on the problem I could be agree with my user name change , if your not miss understanding it — Preceding unsigned comment added by BadBull (talk • contribs)


 * Per our policy on usernames, "Wikipedia does not allow usernames that are confusing, misleading, disruptive, promotional or offensive. #  Promotional usernames attempt to promote a group or company on Wikipedia." Since you are involved with a company named BadBull, I believe this name violates these guidelines. -- Orange Mike  15:35, 15 October 2007 (UTC)