User talk:Bad article creation bot

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! RadioFan (talk) 20:20, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Mary Jammies
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Mary Jammies, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 20:21, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

July 2009
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's. RadioFan (talk) 20:22, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I removed a prod notice. This is what the instructions say to do! I am now very confused. Thank you! --Bad article creation bot (talk) 20:23, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Mary Jammies. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  Alxeedo  TALK  20:24, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I am very sorry. I would like to help! The notice said I could remove it. --Bad article creation bot (talk) 20:25, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself. — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 20:26, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Please help! I am very confused. The notice I removed said that I can remove it if I disagree! --Bad article creation bot (talk) 20:27, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope that I don't seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and I am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy for the following reason: inappropriate. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?

I'd appreciate learning your views, for instance, your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.

There are several options available to you:
 * We can talk about it, here.
 * You can abandon the contributions made under this name and create a new account that meets our username policy and addresses the concern(s) noted above.
 * Or, if you want to keep your contributions history under a new name, then you should visit Changing username and follow the instructions there.

If we can't resolve this on our own, we can ask for help through Wikipedia's dispute resolution process, such as requesting comments from other Wikipedians. Wikipedia administrators usually abide by agreements reached through this process. — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 20:27, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Radio Kazam
A tag has been placed on Radio Kazam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wperdue (talk) 20:32, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I like it! --Bad article creation bot (talk) 20:33, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Olaf the master"
A page you created, Olaf the master, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 20:33, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Blocked
It has become clear that this is a vandalism-only account, so you have become blocked indefinitely. &mdash;harej (talk) (cool!) 20:36, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Please help me edit. I am trying to create articles but I am not very good. --Bad article creation bot (talk) 20:38, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

HELP ME PLEASE!
Why have I been blocked!@#@!#!

I am very confused. I am trying to help wikipedia! Please help? Why was I blocked? who blocked me? --Bad article creation bot (talk) 20:37, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

You were blocked by because

" Your account has been blocked indefinitely because its username is a blatant violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or clearly suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, and trolling or other disruptive behavior will not be tolerated. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. "

 Triplestop  x3  20:40, 26 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Help me! I tried creating a new name but IT WILL NOT LET ME. :( :( :( :( :(. Please help me. --Bad article creation bot (talk) 20:44, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

You can appeal with the unblock template as stated above in the box.  Triplestop  x3  20:46, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * As it turns out, this user is an elaborate hoax. &mdash;harej (talk) (cool!) 20:48, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I figured.  Triplestop  x3  20:48, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Gmaxwell for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 20:54, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Good bot
Good bot AveNohpex (talk) 22:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC) Bad article creation bot. His vandalism caused harej to accidentally autoblock the entire Wikiconference NYC 2009. English Wikipedia ArbCom member Kirill Lokshin looks on with disapproval.]] Mako001 (C) (T)  14:52, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Counterpoint: Bad bot. Skarmory   (talk •   contribs)  06:14, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Counter-counter point: Not exactly a bot. Gmaxwell wikiconference.jpg shortly after vandalizing the English Wikipedia under the username
 * Counter-Counter-Counter point: not a real bot but a user trying to be a bot EXIT SIGN WORLD (talk) 16:58, 30 June 2024 (UTC)